IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)

sob@harvard.edu (Scott O. Bradner) Sat, 18 July 2009 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@harvard.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D183A690A for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NAbKFhl3eOFL for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from newdev.eecs.harvard.edu (newdev.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.212]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F86C3A63CB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by newdev.eecs.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 501) id AAE5B1AA71F1; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:28:04 -0400 (EDT)
To: tme@americafree.tv
Subject: Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)
Message-Id: <20090718222804.AAE5B1AA71F1@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:28:04 -0400
From: sob@harvard.edu
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:28:32 -0000

I may have missed it but I did not see any response to my posting
from when these changes were first proposed

along the lines of what John just posted - I thought that the Trust was
supposed to be responsive to requests from the IETF not go off on its own
figuring out things to do

I would like a clear statement of what the trust thinks its role is

and if it not to be responsive to requests from the IETF I think we
need to have a discussion on the IETF list to understand if any other
role is one that is supported by the IETF community

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email