IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv10.

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Fri, 11 November 2016 13:31 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B3B1296B0; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 05:31:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TGqGmn_A4znj; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 05:31:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [217.70.190.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5924C1296A6; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 05:31:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 9412831D72; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:31:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: by godin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E13F6EC0B59; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:29:19 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:29:19 +0900
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: IPv10.
Message-ID: <20161111132919.GB21496@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <HE1PR04MB1449514D421EAC698335EE99BDBB0@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR04MB1449514D421EAC698335EE99BDBB0@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/zGCNQi5Sy74lILFwS9U7zSdd9fk>
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 13:31:43 -0000

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 01:08:12PM +0000,
 Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com> wrote 
 a message of 111 lines which said:

> in making the final version of the IPv10 draft

Where is the current version?
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/search/?name=ipv10&sort=&rfcs=on&activedrafts=on&by=group&group=>
finds nothing. On <http://internetprotocolv10.blogspot.jp/>, there is
a just one short blog post, without any detail.

> I'm curious to receive comments, suggestions, and modifications

Today, there are not enough substance in this proposal to allow any
commenting.

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status