IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Adoption Call for "Improving the Robustness of Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC) to Flash Renumbering Events"

"jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com" <jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com> Mon, 13 July 2020 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22CD63A1631 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aiuh57kuVUcJ for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A94B3A1666 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5BCR6wsfz1p6C1; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1594662963; bh=M86suzc55wmMwI+OefaaVqIIJWjGlX4TDXGn5GpuoKs=; h=Date:Subject:In-Reply-To:From:To:Cc:From; b=CZtnwrSdKhjq6PO8MaYQq2tH2KNdba33vEk0wY3XBegdtEEa5EzybjnsuoqENl5TA 5jzSSOfgZNWcUJJMATVMF1rUOkWePI6SD+jsXqAlUH/ESdhdgE8POv7pMTfnKh9K1C BQM1401sSjf1aESU8fM6ppQ5J8uKbrCJZ97nrAy0=
X-Quarantine-ID: <yJw79cy4s4Xj>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from [IPv6:2600:380:9145:cf36:e00f:eaaf:8b47:6eb] (unknown [IPv6:2600:380:9145:cf36:e00f:eaaf:8b47:6eb]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B5BCQ1Qscz1p5xZ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
SavedFromEmail: jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 13:56:00 -0400
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Adoption Call for "Improving the Robustness of Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC) to Flash Renumbering Events"
In-Reply-To: <706e2eb0-3da8-66f5-956f-116194c4c5e3@si6networks.com>
Importance: normal
From: "jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com" <jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, "Manfredi (US), Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--_com.samsung.android.email_7455549970858860"
Message-Id: <20200713175604.2A94B3A1666@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/9WXvZKwcxL0CEnUiP5yZoAqc8zQ>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 17:56:11 -0000

And I not only do I not speak for the chairs, I do not gave a clue what the WG rough consensus is.  Yours,JoelSent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Date: 7/13/20  13:46  (GMT-05:00) To: "Manfredi (US), Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Cc: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Adoption Call for "Improving the Robustness of
  Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC) to Flash Renumbering Events" On 12/7/20 18:36, Manfredi (US), Albert E wrote:> Joel took the words out of my mouth. As in, "Fernando, you remove section xyz, we might consider adoption."It seems to me that what Joel said is different: the outcome of a wg call for adoption may be that if there parts that have support, and parts that don't, a document may be adopted on the condition that the parts that do not have support be removed before the draft-ietf version of the document is posted.That's quite different from "strip this, and try again", which might not be the best use of the wg's energy.Thanks,-- Fernando GontSI6 Networkse-mail: fgont@si6networks.comPGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email