IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Conclusion of Adoption Call for "Improving the Robustness of Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC) to Flash Renumbering Events"

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Mon, 13 July 2020 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075863A17AE for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ycTT7vGhUc0C for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A7B03A1797 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id j4so17915220wrp.10 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=mZRkcktzSxq3cl3aNK8zdFPBY7aoqe2PfPOT5R2n0ic=; b=fVDlH9YEL9b1lkqiWhpyd0SQrGrasYFTVSTX7z3/z61ueZ2unJMTsN9eRQV4AB6h+B RzywaNIBdJKQsde4MP5rZ40OfelSsH4Dzbz5YXtOt2GNhSsKB+fj0UVsio/syu8qRc3T p3rrge4GlR+EgeLOW/aS3lNeOUjIwKivDT2vO3SXXRyRpr6NASOuStZWPLrSGwHJapp2 7uwfHFsIy3Z3LBx3YmMoJhW3GibKFr0naIvrB0Gtt1I+WnA2Rc9YeWgTnlYFGt6lE+sB J4BMaui00oce2bOUrCxHv5w7kp5WtKTE2srXlrSGkLYRgGqvyFaluZ1Vn+PvXZxu7oJ7 q4tw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=mZRkcktzSxq3cl3aNK8zdFPBY7aoqe2PfPOT5R2n0ic=; b=Kx6G1xTQOMK/CrhC2NrewV9BFBRFh53urHkmMCbSU3XQP0IoyvuLVT1PlI4ul9K/Ii Z7oQDBTp334SLLeDw5jbku/ckh9t3Ld2f1xIeG4oonWdMlJnHkSitEeS/wA+WftJjiON aG5eE4epIVmvXp+wKgLYkGs2naNfJ3mrfAbQ6wGX8tG3jW4BP3IisBnOWUr5Pwc0g+Ys nLJ3qv/jwl+vV99gOW3BjGAzexcGOZBuvzXwykawnSrGfcDXFt0rk+YS0jvAAUwng9gf rQ2Q7rzgma0Ca2vWaI4KTMA4pX8Ep6hiPYTlRnhNMBs5CvoAjPNocruB/QYqiHA6jee+ OCNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530G04pdlqIHq8lhxGrLj2mOy+i2lukLXGW3IPtAlDd5utWkKPXG u1TKgGP2hcLCjCtOT8uHGN4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwgR7PhJELUj2TcC8vghj8d1puIYEPHZxQZFxmiAYv7Y7Kr7OK+sDnbXd8G+VTxNJujsCLTXA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:11cc:: with SMTP id i12mr1003823wrx.224.1594667916381; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5a00:ef0b:7170:3eed:8037:e7a9? ([2601:647:5a00:ef0b:7170:3eed:8037:e7a9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l14sm25911959wrn.18.2020.07.13.12.18.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:18:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <2A492A9E-90D4-465D-BE21-D6240EC8A0E1@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6500F94A-BCF5-4E52-9230-D0B35192ABE7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
Subject: Re: Conclusion of Adoption Call for "Improving the Robustness of Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC) to Flash Renumbering Events"
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:18:25 -0700
In-Reply-To: <B329C64F-B081-4A8A-A023-21BB8210A468@fugue.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
References: <CC295D49-5981-41C3-B4DB-E064D66616CE@gmail.com> <4F9636F8-364A-4272-8D01-BFAA91D4A86C@gmail.com> <606f0b2f-6351-438e-5376-a35f1e12cb69@si6networks.com> <AA0F96B5-92AA-4CD1-97CF-05791DD8187D@gmail.com> <B329C64F-B081-4A8A-A023-21BB8210A468@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/qTwKkg_MPARYHNWBfRsspMpCxm8>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 19:18:40 -0000


> On Jul 13, 2020, at 11:59 AM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> 
> On Jul 13, 2020, at 2:46 PM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> There have been objections against Section 4.5, but I haven't seen any to the proposals in Section 4. In fact, even explicit support for some of such sections have been voice (Lorenzo for Section 4.2, Jen for Section 4.1.1, etc.).
>> 
>> We would like to see each discussed separately.  Some should be easy to add back in, others, like 4.5 will be harder.
> 
> This is a confusing statement. Who is the “we” here?

We as in the w.g. chairs.

Bob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email