Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-00.txt
Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 06 July 2021 07:48 UTC
Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62F13A1B17 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 00:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GBb5y95lVTdO for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 00:48:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x336.google.com (mail-ot1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31F513A1B15 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 00:48:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x336.google.com with SMTP id d27-20020a05683018fbb02904ae64d1b56bso16976otf.9 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Jul 2021 00:48:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YQUf1O730qHydCxwz/t7vG4mlR/W+iXM/GDJPltWF4c=; b=kx6g8Bsl9qCHVY7rquQVtvD43j7OgYweqiQ8tygw0AD9ZA5pIQshplMpJyXZCjeHoH sRJAJPnrC/j4AGACQIa+I3vfZUqyVhHn9LfQnt6EtxmizMSpaZlEQLwUIaK3ADvO4E+f QBG6sU/Nn4+lnBGwSueVDTfNcvy9YDpNiafiSkhAuceJ0/loPn5fmEAjBdPCfvmBfZ7H zXAjDG95+3q4xoJ2UD62wwIFY3cx65zyTDyooiZwKXz21gvd9Og1VcizVZpUYUA9CEhl JvcoTOPu/OGVDLLAMcyvzvo2Aw3rjyfjrBj3o9jpsfdACOSbmwCUURw3VA59cVI45Eh3 hATw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YQUf1O730qHydCxwz/t7vG4mlR/W+iXM/GDJPltWF4c=; b=Rn4FLfxwA5YNzSHAbRcFAM0712G/hVe6kjn5fCye2WSCIdEYsr2Q3BPCWwxIn4foJ7 9K6/imzt0oEH8AZB+ih3oS3C7CulFcZShl/GZUOJst1Fptyv5XikOJZqt7DSp+3paVS5 yp0oX4j6zPaEHHVFB1bqLnTLD2l2GQCyFHIrNs/cy1mBoCdq2k3ArzNsdueG8Kwi9MXG cGQ2KXx/d34t9e9yot49kq1S2euyIBWt7wnC7EXerd6HNE2bjQrNNwpH06aaRTJeEtk7 VBV7MjFzbk1dqjMIWQrv6IIZtSwkbQp44ib2o0uWGW/wcPSqKxYKzT5szyIqQhYrVDbk j+mQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533R0uZU6MFmUN1ePjGPe5hmE7LlMRQhil9ShvxWV8voY4zWoz9N ZTigobmThyT9BpzcEWaArY3ON2JkM6YNhopPCCQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzOlYmD3VfyDWrLCFm87pjBwvOOK27jEijy/VlLqDtK77TDG8xddzVhGyvu0GUHO9zOMkiLxjEjWM7QgOUhO2s=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1e83:: with SMTP id n3mr13811911otr.49.1625557695888; Tue, 06 Jul 2021 00:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162545101341.19246.8566193740265797873@ietfa.amsl.com> <95a7dbe5-e0a3-4676-9dcc-005ff53725e0@gmail.com> <17913.1625498932@localhost> <40fae532-f344-4789-187b-58f41a80ae35@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <40fae532-f344-4789-187b-58f41a80ae35@gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 08:47:49 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMBXEYxOZTUcwVw7OpBHax9McmyxZvwcO7YwN=J9W4WT+g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-00.txt
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000067ee205c66fa59f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/IJf84kDaxr9jmJdpGm2mVI37zhw>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 07:48:22 -0000
Hi Brian, In-line below On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 9:50 PM Brian E Carpenter < brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > On 06-Jul-21 03:28, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > > First, I think that this work is really important, and I'd like to > proceed. > > > > Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The new draft proposes to update the RFC accordingly. The changes > > > are relatively small but significant. There's a diff between the > > > RFC and this draft at: > > > > https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~brian/Diff-rfc6874-draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-00.html > > > > I read the diff, and I was unable to actually figure out what had > changed :-( > > > > > Comments welcome. If we want to go ahead with this fix, we will > need to > > > reach out to the URI specialists and the browser community, to be > sure > > > it isn't a waste of time. > > > > Does the zoneid go into the Host: header or not? > > I can't tell at this point. > > As I understand the HTTP/1.1 spec, the Host: header is required to include > the complete URI, This is not correct. Please see RFC 7230, Section 5.4. The full URI would include scheme and the path, which are not included in the host header. regards, Ted > so RFC6874 was wrong anyway because it did not claim > to update HTTP :-). So yes, and furthermore at least one deployed > protocol (CUPS) relies on it. > > Brian > > > > > > > -- > > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT > consulting ) > > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
- Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Ted Hardie
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Nico Schottelius
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Ted Hardie
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Nick Hilliard
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874… Michael Richardson
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Nico Schottelius
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874… Ted Hardie
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Michael Richardson
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Andrew Cady
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Ted Hardie
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Andrew Cady
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Andrew Cady
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Andrew Cady
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Michael Richardson
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Jared Mauch
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Andrew Cady
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Nico Schottelius
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Nico Schottelius
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Michael Richardson
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Michael Richardson
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Carsten Bormann
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Andrew Cady
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Jared Mauch
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Ted Hardie
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Philip Homburg
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Michael Richardson
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Philip Homburg
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Michael Richardson
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Michael Richardson
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Andrew Cady
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Michael Richardson
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Nick Hilliard
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Nick Hilliard
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Michael Richardson
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter