IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Consensus call on adopting: <draft-gont-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-01>

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 13 April 2012 07:14 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B46E21F86B4 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.661
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.908, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JX3+1C3m3unD for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com (mail-wg0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8243121F86B0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgbdr13 with SMTP id dr13so1858736wgb.13 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZzfbM/p5G0ifFc9VeLisTTqRFiF+rabV2TN9r8Uxju4=; b=aIiYN6v/DL5i7fgYBt5fiimA5gOEwZoPc1vvTjDqpLs9+NhIZTGtnClRhj1+3rSm1v DDc4CQkMzOWK9oPm1yeWinULh7cHMGsrKE4I2/S71X5aEChbuqep5uFM+d5o+/FnRUpU OvZBPdPGwgW4rg8yiknDqlp2ViJBDYI+ukkpzOD6op5cTU69KUNFrFpUy5B9BjB13RWe DZjYKq+rRbKPoGR+CsMT5LdI3VO25BrdYyMwi9FNHzjIeaP0v9YheN/Gk6iWMaU9QS4F TnTdGp4Khtswm8qK0fu7Ayf/0xeN1sX9Ujav82GEmAGjTPCiP3yAMbk2rs30JR+9Hsc4 YXug==
Received: by 10.180.102.100 with SMTP id fn4mr2106411wib.1.1334301255737; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.69] (host-2-102-219-159.as13285.net. [2.102.219.159]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ca3sm2771729wib.6.2012.04.13.00.14.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4F87D245.4000102@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:14:13 +0100
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Consensus call on adopting: <draft-gont-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-01>
References: <E7607B61-9889-43A9-B86B-133BD4238BA2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E7607B61-9889-43A9-B86B-133BD4238BA2@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, IPv6 WG Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:14:17 -0000

On 2012-04-12 22:28, Bob Hinden wrote:
> All,
> 
> This is a consensus call on adopting:
> 
>     Title     : A method for Generating Stable Privacy-Enhanced Addresses with
>                 IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC)
>     Author(s) : Fernando Gont
>     Filename  : draft-gont-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-01
>     Pages     : 15
>     Date      : 2012-12-31
> 
>     http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-01
> 
> as a 6MAN working group document.  Please state your opinion, positive
> or negative, on the mailing list or to the chairs.  This consensus call
> will end on April 26, 2012.

Yes to adoption. Karl Auer's points all need discussion, and I think
we also need to consider the impact on 3484bis.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email