IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsvr] Kicking off the LSVR (Link State Vector Routing) charter discussion

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 18 January 2018 22:53 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA30126C0F for <lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:53:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SIlAJm55kQVQ for <lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:53:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F8511205D3 for <Lsvr@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:53:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id g1so23753wmg.2 for <Lsvr@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:53:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=ek5Pv6WuEeT9VPJLZeSP1l6a55DZfWjvc+68dCndXqQ=; b=Ppv5QLQMF7XmaGX/EgyYZX1Ylx5JA9PA5SuSIcq092jcyd0FTQH4Y70TgdL0s52hFj 3tEksiBMnEqFGJ5p95WCAzZtdFj/Be0teHq77gpGHaewOegQzC4XlLpZDjdSgX2DYnSh SYAuVXMjjxmkccuOA2Y1HCmc2kJet9gC0AulbWdN0uh8uTGWV+q2YY8RCe9jdxFhL4gq 8YH3f4pp4F1tg/dHcDzK69tWZyYvejnJ83oZh6klP+aESlQST7kUduMlEhG+gVhqQcls oyNgY99HZCGhBiBIdpT7us7fwHOqEPXp0/e26pVytWjgxHD3D6g8bhO0XOzdxzfHfGNs kysw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ek5Pv6WuEeT9VPJLZeSP1l6a55DZfWjvc+68dCndXqQ=; b=Wyb6sq3kGnavroKXefLZtY3ne3pC33fmnw0nBkocC7Ld9q2HePP3ulSs0iPaBcuVp/ t8A0AaPo1EGLeqhZTHWa9LdS2+QB5NVZcxKHjaA9XKmKsXLpccMR71QJ+G2KqdHwkyZJ g3UpGbK8qvwgvIxPl3CC4vornwQuwUsO1BZS3BQfUZX+fgy+nML/Z2w3XBL1DBrEuwYz /8dhFI64rB1v8jdk0JZcKc/NdasrpakHXJzEwbCiv6UL6HVgDPoDa6ZXTk33mCOQ7Hzf j7MwL/vXNOjmZr6GaJvk7YLfHlNhoF36w4ZbK/rX5OVAPKmjgu7T7meNpTLi8KzlR0Yx eWwA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdDhj61QARWo2PAdHDchhdxSo1g1Dny7pFNEv3SDXGe4oX0fwEg eWGzinPgvBoAp+L8EFOwyTNkQ47yZl4BNi7QIPE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosdMrdxX74ih1LO2y5xe3J51LmbU15E013RwLlSLkEaWeiPp0cdSOC+LL2hqZukzNQgwSb1GITLUqVlYW7BGPU=
X-Received: by 10.28.61.68 with SMTP id k65mr5910889wma.147.1516316025695; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:53:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.28.74.139 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:53:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.28.74.139 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:53:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <71703812-2113-40A1-B299-251B9961E3A4@gmail.com>
References: <CAJc3aaO8-OdJDNwNmofsadVWVdWdhk45p3Qs1DKjCvN1R_0vPA@mail.gmail.com> <D59B7ABE-F423-4F67-8DB3-2A177C6BD567@gmail.com> <F7708676-BE03-424D-8BBB-10AB0D1D3854@gmail.com> <m2inbystfc.wl-randy@psg.com> <71703812-2113-40A1-B299-251B9961E3A4@gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 23:53:44 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: fk42DQWR7tCh_W12PShpKDDS0YU
Message-ID: <CA+b+ER=4q8cfnQkk8zMBgUauaHvjyWDLvGG9P11UZ+Ndyt77kw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>, Lsvr@ietf.org, Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>, victor@jvknet.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114b2d021435be056314d6c5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsvr/15_o3XUyTGlQJ4FC1AqYl-g93ms>
Subject: Re: [Lsvr] Kicking off the LSVR (Link State Vector Routing) charter discussion
X-BeenThere: lsvr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Vector Routing <lsvr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsvr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsvr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 22:53:50 -0000

Tony,

There are some questions on how bgp spf would select routes when executed
concurrently with "standard" bgp.

The answer by some is to run it in parallel and just call it bgp as
otherwise it will not sell ;)

---

Outside of all of this Alia and Alvaro are setting working groups for both
rift and bgp-spf based on their own judgements.

In Singapore we had a non wg forming bof on dc routing. How did that result
in creation of two new wg is unknown.

Is this how now IETF working groups get formed ? Behind the scene and
without even single document spelling out what is wrong with current
protocols ?

Cheers,
R



On Jan 18, 2018 23:33, "Tony Li" <tony1athome@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> >
> >> As we adopt the charter and in future adapt to align further to more
> >> DC/Scale requirements, we may want to consider and explore an idea of
> >> running BGP over multiple ports(besides 179).
> >
> > i'm feeling slow todsy.  is this a hint that, for example, spf might use
> > a diff port?
>
>
> And how would that help?
>
> Tony
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsvr mailing list
> Lsvr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email