IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsvr] Kicking off the LSVR (Link State Vector Routing) charter discussion

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 25 January 2018 21:15 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9125128896 for <lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:15:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mFlufAQE-5P1 for <lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:15:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 515AF1271DF for <lsvr@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:15:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id r71so17374379wmd.1 for <lsvr@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:15:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=k77Vzx2q6hzu0oWq1AQ07DsEFS1TUPyQ8/LErsZVxIU=; b=X2OMIHupDidafHmKX9FaeLl3iYspvc4GeRZFCV6QMMPbiihLPlTxD4v3xR6LDVqnB6 D1wWoHfDik7wDY38HcQrmn3g1Uh22RDvW7UQuUKYBz/gwsf8eK0QJos9TS2VrxN98YsW KQgtM7WyNDQR2cMeAofrwcYsPJYj0DxxHy4e2eVczwvV1aDo80nn1Xw8kw5qs5hpvdDH 9OT0YkcVb2jjKR1AwOuLrdl836qGudiViCKWxCaOsUFsyxH1SuQavl69E/Kx7VZidYZA jk0NV16RAOmpgmqFClWZxbTBAir+XIYpTQ7xQguxWop2QqlhHkorMdGAwWP6N0lltoDh f5ag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=k77Vzx2q6hzu0oWq1AQ07DsEFS1TUPyQ8/LErsZVxIU=; b=JDoqogGnDtUo3F8abwP7bGdYyQ0/7tRVb6mzTszjp5G8+HT51thWYTJEbnsdKY8GsW zbH+CVXpfoeID9enFdlhnYEtYW/W/oxhv8IkHnfSdOl35aqe4YGhqesez5NTQ/kB4dXy vu5zX0JAfJ6/fxzpeFnH8SLq7d8ygMvLqWdhEDz58uBd542yMmUe0e05hvAMVl7/1uUM 6hh31/JfA+DhelOSD8gxLcwkz1m9eDX2iw2EwxbL+OZxxatgTjStnc1rZNeJaqGV//Rw RH6xjTOi8LyAlGnTZWXqulfkJdLfxyEnruDB6GrCh60a8C6hoT20QCglHHUQ6EulpGxO tDuQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytditG2qy+Wd4lJyXgF3XLK71vX8ANqLmgOhSOIgsZ81ZzMUpSUm A+Cketjw9ocrs31SUhDWin+DVXCl
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224Nu/VRlkT3qu3td0Zvw33o7kvJMYeZT+ifW8q9SF+mp2KshF0E2Pa0rlsAKIzDFeAldKdAVQ==
X-Received: by 10.28.4.84 with SMTP id 81mr8313466wme.150.1516914916532; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:15:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 234.66.20.149.in-addr.arpa (234.66.20.149.in-addr.arpa. [149.20.66.234]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5sm6109341wre.35.2018.01.25.13.15.14 for <lsvr@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:15:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_78FFD67B-F25A-43D5-9D93-1715F2B60DC2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:15:11 -0800
References: <CAEFuwkhz0ze84wmSD82hWNogJA8rxVgV7NLedqeP2gDa1Gi0Pw@mail.gmail.com> <5A61AA43-8C1F-48AB-A984-817FBE1A0419@gmail.com> <CAPH1YdiGy12Tec2EQ+gd2GziSEduEv80b_VvArSB8JVWX33tug@mail.gmail.com>
To: lsvr@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAPH1YdiGy12Tec2EQ+gd2GziSEduEv80b_VvArSB8JVWX33tug@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <89774842-3726-4F74-85B0-FD4F2DFBE46B@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsvr/3ujyFRA1prhKbK6P0eUQn7_KuZE>
Subject: Re: [Lsvr] Kicking off the LSVR (Link State Vector Routing) charter discussion
X-BeenThere: lsvr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Vector Routing <lsvr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsvr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsvr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 21:15:20 -0000

Likewise, the charter seems reasonable. The one question I had reading it was that it seems to contain protocol details that might need to be changed in the process of working group discussion, and so should perhaps be left to the documents. I'd suggest text such as "protocol details will be as described in" whatever the right document is, "consistent with" the right RFC.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email