IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsvr] Kicking off the LSVR (Link State Vector Routing) charter discussion

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 18 January 2018 22:17 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9201205D3 for <lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:17:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iMleT_7EsqUE for <lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:17:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94F5E12025C for <Lsvr@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:17:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1ecIVD-0002Xz-UT; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 22:17:44 +0000
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:17:43 -0800
Message-ID: <m2inbystfc.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Lsvr@ietf.org, gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com, victor@jvknet.com
In-Reply-To: <F7708676-BE03-424D-8BBB-10AB0D1D3854@gmail.com>
References: <CAJc3aaO8-OdJDNwNmofsadVWVdWdhk45p3Qs1DKjCvN1R_0vPA@mail.gmail.com> <D59B7ABE-F423-4F67-8DB3-2A177C6BD567@gmail.com> <F7708676-BE03-424D-8BBB-10AB0D1D3854@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/25.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsvr/8TBkgc_ksAsCdBoCssuvfh4jngw>
Subject: Re: [Lsvr] Kicking off the LSVR (Link State Vector Routing) charter discussion
X-BeenThere: lsvr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Vector Routing <lsvr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsvr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsvr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 22:17:47 -0000

> As we adopt the charter and in future adapt to align further to more
> DC/Scale requirements, we may want to consider and explore an idea of
> running BGP over multiple ports(besides 179).

i'm feeling slow todsy.  is this a hint that, for example, spf might use
a diff port?

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email