Re: [Lsvr] Kicking off the LSVR (Link State Vector Routing) charter discussion

[Yingzhen Qu <[e-mail]>]

Hi all,

The charter looks good. I think it's a good starting point and I'm looking
forward to working on it.

Thanks,
Yingzhen

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Tony Li <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
>
> Routing in a DC is too broad — so instead we chose to focus on specific
> solutions (the proposals behind lsvr and rift), which is why the charters
> are the way they are (focused on solutions and not problems).  Also, while
> I think there is interest in the solutions, the real proof will come from
> active participation in the WGs.  This brings me to think that focusing the
> work should result in measurable progress, in the short term.  The intent
> is then to charter work that can reasonably be completed in about 12-18
> months.  After that, we can think about making the scope of the WG broader.
>
> I do agree with you in that we could be steering ourselves away from other
> solutions — but at the same time a broader initial charter could result in
> scope creep and lack of focus.
>
> Having said that — I will be starting the Internal Review of the charter
> this week with the goal of having a WG up and running before we get to
> London.
>
>
> Fair enough.  We await your wisdom.
>
> Tony
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsvr mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr
>
>