Re: [Lsvr] Kicking off the LSVR (Link State Vector Routing) charter discussion

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Wed, 10 January 2018 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB3012700F for <lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 07:03:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XjE0nY4I-fO1 for <lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 07:03:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65C8C126B6E for <Lsvr@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 07:03:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEE8245B49; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 07:03:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=1.tigertech; t=1515596614; bh=YHGQY2XPeNvMTS17cC15UzO2YvI17q4Tk6JV2tNS8FM=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=V7TJ0VMzajIIm7nldUyoShK+Tv4AO9Q+8Cx7qWZ5pCMOSNC/YR0tM7AK2S0EsIjhp n7S8uwynpkFcVO0wCe55ZYjdhRUtVpgHDG0ihMipoiawoPYTfa03xniMhKw8TQ1YmT M5cn0OMY/sKzRIX93NUBmf8w8j6BVxg2I4GqcJic=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at maila2.tigertech.net
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (unknown [50.225.209.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBA6F2510C6; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 07:03:33 -0800 (PST)
To: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>, "Lsvr@ietf.org" <Lsvr@ietf.org>
References: <AM5PR0701MB2836FFBB9A9F6C3D7C3C7122E0110@AM5PR0701MB2836.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <41561533-54c0-0505-04bd-78ea57d9b05f@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:03:33 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AM5PR0701MB2836FFBB9A9F6C3D7C3C7122E0110@AM5PR0701MB2836.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsvr/ylo8CV1yY4aBznWCV37l8VZbhbI>
Subject: Re: [Lsvr] Kicking off the LSVR (Link State Vector Routing) charter discussion
X-BeenThere: lsvr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Vector Routing <lsvr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsvr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsvr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:03:36 -0000

I had expected the charter to explicitly call out the need for the 
documents to call out the need for an analysis and discussion of 
interaction with the conventional BGP decision process when the same BGP 
finds the same prefix reachable in its conventional DV information and 
its LSVR information.
I expect that it should be straightforward to make sure that neighboring 
devices reach the same conclusions about forwarding path in such 
circumstance.  But it is important.

Yours,
Joel

On 1/10/18 5:50 AM, Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote:
> [Note: Target audience, and discussions should happen on lsvr@ietf.org, however "rtgwg", "idr" and "dcrouting" email lists have been added as the concepts originated in those working groups]
> 
> Since dcrouting@ietf100, a few people have been discussing a possible WG charter for LSVR (Link State Vector Routing).
> Here is what we have so far.  Comments and improvements would be most welcome.
> 
> WG page is to be setup soon.
> Subscription to LSVR mailing list: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr
> 
> Feedback (comments, edits, corrections, etc)  on the draft LSVR charter is appreciated
> 
> 
> ***** DRAFT CHARTER UPDATE - JAN 10 2018 *****
>   
> Charter: LSVR - Link State Vector Routing
>   
> The Link-State Vector Routing (LSVR) Working Group is chartered to develop and document a hybrid routing protocol utilizing a combination of link-state and path-vector routing mechanisms.  The LSVR WG will utilize existing the IPv4/IPv6 transport, packet formats, and error handling from BGP-4 (RFC4271). Additionally, the BGP-LS NLRI encoding mechanisms defined in RFC7752 are utilized to facilitate Link-State Vector (LSV) routing information distribution. An LSV is intended to be specified as a data structure comprised of a link identification, link attributes, neighbor information, cost toward neighbors, and other attributes that are defined for control plane function and policy-based routing decisions.
>   
> The LSVR specification is initially focused on operation within a single datacenter (DC) with preliminary focus on specifying functionality within a single distribution domain.  Routing protocol functionality defined by LSVR would be typically routing within a datacenter's underlay routing plane.
>   
> In order to achieve the noted objective, the working group will focus on standardization of protocol functionality, defining Link-State Vectors (LSVs), and defining standard path-vector route selection utilizing existing Dijkstra SPF based algorithm, BGP-4 protocol mechanics, and BGP-LS NRLI encoding.
>   
> For the purposes of the initial work within the LSVR WG, and until further specified by the WG, the following definitions apply to this charter.
>   
> - Link-State Vector - An LSV is intended to represent a data structure (data set) comprised of link identification, link attributes, neighbor information, cost towards neighbors, and other potential attributes that can be utilized to make routing decisions.
> - LSVR Distribution Domain - Initially scoped as a set of participating LSVR nodes in a single administrative domain.
>   
>   
> The LSVR WG is chartered to deliver the following documents:
>   
> - Publish Applicability Statement for the use of LSVR in the Datacenter - Target Status: Informational
> - Publish specification document describing LSV with standard Dijkstra SPF route/path selection (calculation) utilizing existing BGP protocol baseline functionality and BGP-LS packet encoding formats - Target: Standards Track (Based on draft draft-keyupate-idr-bgp-spf)
> - Publish specification documenting protocol extensions required to efficiently reuse BGP to distribute LSVs within an IPv4/IPv6 DC with scope to include privacy and security considerations - - Target: Standards Track
> - Publish YANG model specification for LSVR - - Target: Standards Track
>   
> LSVR Milestones:
>   
> - Applicability statement for LSVR in DCs: March 2019
> - LSVR with standard Dijkstra path selection: March 2019
> - LSV distribution using BGP transport: March 2019
> - YANG specification for LSRV: July 2019
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>