Re: [Lsvr] Kicking off the LSVR (Link State Vector Routing) charter discussion

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Thu, 18 January 2018 23:28 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BB812D77C for <lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:28:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lq-SHAvkki4e for <lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:28:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22d.google.com (mail-oi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88A21120713 for <Lsvr@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:28:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id y141so16963612oia.0 for <Lsvr@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:28:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZhLzeEzR6IrcD9fGt/jA0XdFqfAhFINPV5H9wDyLeoc=; b=GCGoNVbv98deP31o2kohJAj70tQo6bv8FsGbmxKaNh7Gbqmm4i5e3FBt9nJBZCpLeE lv/na7QPaTPTTLz7D63x/aqOWYWp2xHMZ1gMoLrVoPccr7ZASsmrHwJ4ujs5c7YlOWeY 9XcUean8QODhTBle4jzo7FfcSUOHYFRiwjFuF46Lcd9uoVhIXueeIQJejgqeYgFX8JUg zbY5ce0OjYWqa+W/D7dcPV61mGvIh5KzHzfbzyKtliBcW2tD0PrboHiaUUEbHRhELa1z dizePFInPa+zlt7iDeBsMEKRJ8UsYxeoVmUee6zyi8GbUbL3E4P6HQJLcxcjaj/Jt9LF RN9A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZhLzeEzR6IrcD9fGt/jA0XdFqfAhFINPV5H9wDyLeoc=; b=of4dRNrGPUOPpBnmwcU8/w961YPzRV8QtYe0KJYdSzuHq90/GJssAdklbDfbSOmSCz LbnkHY0Li7tFbu5BmjW2Hw/bSUfmLGeeUhbyqFIYTrQt496OFHNDAVzoMObaP5b95FGp NO5Trxy192G+0g5nPeeNUrwdUEMZIRrW/lhU8nCs2tejQTc9r4z+ZPGdR9yi0EALBZft lB1HPQ32epGsu2ub1w8esMxm89/wn68lfJZYla7wG5pxWR91ZTQ0QdNKytDN7eMEF4v6 t3bSFTex2l/lJuUtJtuKZj3hXgJUGx8DgR86DBSV/8Ivmw2bJcXFiTvscY1APXY/EicZ aQVw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdoi2HLy/r6zmcDmWAw1hDBvggyHqJM1zteMrOaJ9BC56M/JHn6 9xZ3ESOt42seEavIbznXxLNc8p2d/8/hrQYCGUo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouqD2NP/pfNNRIHTd2mmQTfPvyWw3Bid0xSmsJF+EipOm/+wyn116wewbuXBnpAXQ3ASlvGm6BLSihEnvCfAoo=
X-Received: by 10.202.215.6 with SMTP id o6mr4085287oig.108.1516318080706; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:28:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.67.47 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:28:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ER=4q8cfnQkk8zMBgUauaHvjyWDLvGG9P11UZ+Ndyt77kw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJc3aaO8-OdJDNwNmofsadVWVdWdhk45p3Qs1DKjCvN1R_0vPA@mail.gmail.com> <D59B7ABE-F423-4F67-8DB3-2A177C6BD567@gmail.com> <F7708676-BE03-424D-8BBB-10AB0D1D3854@gmail.com> <m2inbystfc.wl-randy@psg.com> <71703812-2113-40A1-B299-251B9961E3A4@gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=4q8cfnQkk8zMBgUauaHvjyWDLvGG9P11UZ+Ndyt77kw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 18:28:00 -0500
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rfWx5CXU+Bh_A5iRef=NtgocS0ck81NWDnOYE4jJw_TFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, victor@jvknet.com, Lsvr@ietf.org, Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>, "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d38ae912dd205631550ac"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsvr/vKp1hWYII6wrWy8xMgACfK-CrxU>
Subject: Re: [Lsvr] Kicking off the LSVR (Link State Vector Routing) charter discussion
X-BeenThere: lsvr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Vector Routing <lsvr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsvr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsvr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 23:28:04 -0000

Robert,

Just to clarify, Alvaro is the sponsoring AD.
Since I am a co-author on RIFT, I am interacting as a contributor.

Regards,
Alia

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:

> Tony,
>
> There are some questions on how bgp spf would select routes when executed
> concurrently with "standard" bgp.
>
> The answer by some is to run it in parallel and just call it bgp as
> otherwise it will not sell ;)
>
> ---
>
> Outside of all of this Alia and Alvaro are setting working groups for both
> rift and bgp-spf based on their own judgements.
>
> In Singapore we had a non wg forming bof on dc routing. How did that
> result in creation of two new wg is unknown.
>
> Is this how now IETF working groups get formed ? Behind the scene and
> without even single document spelling out what is wrong with current
> protocols ?
>
> Cheers,
> R
>
>
>
> On Jan 18, 2018 23:33, "Tony Li" <tony1athome@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >> As we adopt the charter and in future adapt to align further to more
>> >> DC/Scale requirements, we may want to consider and explore an idea of
>> >> running BGP over multiple ports(besides 179).
>> >
>> > i'm feeling slow todsy.  is this a hint that, for example, spf might use
>> > a diff port?
>>
>>
>> And how would that help?
>>
>> Tony
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lsvr mailing list
>> Lsvr@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsvr mailing list
> Lsvr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr
>
>