IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsvr] Kicking off the LSVR (Link State Vector Routing) charter discussion

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 18 January 2018 23:33 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A7F120713 for <lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:33:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kBEM2JXZ_eU8 for <lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:33:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com (mail-oi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CC5F12D77C for <lsvr@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:33:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id n81so16942495oig.8 for <lsvr@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:33:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lUcAxVsSeJ8b0Ih8qd82O/yae0WQCm2xcyme8F5Rq0U=; b=oAZnGYqw5pqVcVgqfOKYMwizyajGLpp9AkXfjWo64GhUWzEcL33Q8U1iarfh+G++Yt 29RBuIFRgh65LF05CnKA7m5RHaKRGV8ea6p5nHDJLlg7G7ik8K7bYhymjt6TNkbzbieH WuCRsktYIy7OX4E9FsbG0o6XpsV29+zPqK40UiiO8kNs6IVjUaJxpQYjySkXfNZBN6Py XVQR5w3sB/ursOHXmLNjLsmC46S6mCMRK4m4WevOyW2Qo9kQ1ffCmEyXI9T8jkjjtHEy wbQC8S5SrM6GtS0oerP9GcOQi3qN0yDoRZ5Ze42iRg5XwFIwM5pvNIZOwfsCafB4O9Mq EUdQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lUcAxVsSeJ8b0Ih8qd82O/yae0WQCm2xcyme8F5Rq0U=; b=YJsg04AL/nMObkXiJZnGXjtTvBAN3Z8nwc8BVQnIb6tTZRNbusBFvH0HaImTUP5lUL JDyWf/v/+LYNCp4BVuim15IPLm19i4vJ2OG2kMhg6Hgaxe2FfhQ6qoI3CbwkdWasFTop aHxFQJHEOaF81IkBrjuw+cX0Z1aNctKtesc+q40qE4zYvJu5XKFsMECGnyEd6MGJXEhh GN4IBO+Gk3wXMRzK8q0As+DVWvjhk88I4ncIX/QZXgt+pHdIRpneRgFBS5FkU9yhZ8eT ESIVjcDl33P5NzvP+UhV0J6PAJaqT42fPRK2E73loWeGqPuJLhP3wKmFxMYe6fzEbWym 0Itw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdFEO4a8qmHzUVR2jCpnZ8QxWQgUIP9TlrCHOfkBMX4plhF9BxE xYZXD/NgHKi3cD3X5sje9V+8Ta6Nmpe3bNX5Mp8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotGejVxRTgaS11IGT/P0jnUbZP3bL7SRz5M6a5npYpdAaaiCYhOvcZV4b5pm4Y5JDsGyrh8X8Md3BVoX07Ua6I=
X-Received: by 10.202.72.69 with SMTP id v66mr3841350oia.214.1516318399844; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:33:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:33:19 -0800
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERn2xCd0Q-4YR3JWFSPCdHO=8SorErSquQXkWxNMvLbWfw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJc3aaO8-OdJDNwNmofsadVWVdWdhk45p3Qs1DKjCvN1R_0vPA@mail.gmail.com> <D59B7ABE-F423-4F67-8DB3-2A177C6BD567@gmail.com> <F7708676-BE03-424D-8BBB-10AB0D1D3854@gmail.com> <m2inbystfc.wl-randy@psg.com> <71703812-2113-40A1-B299-251B9961E3A4@gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=4q8cfnQkk8zMBgUauaHvjyWDLvGG9P11UZ+Ndyt77kw@mail.gmail.com> <42C11665-5A01-4473-A9B3-0FE1F7B0D201@tony.li> <CA+b+ERn2xCd0Q-4YR3JWFSPCdHO=8SorErSquQXkWxNMvLbWfw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Airmail (467)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:33:19 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMMESswsYvbPdydW6ko2Th+0rCHaAKyNo575NSOZ-U3_jiMXWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>, lsvr@ietf.org, victor@jvknet.com, "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1134fe5896d6bb05631563b6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsvr/9t86ZvLwuXPdMRIBsauKpttQOPk>
Subject: Re: [Lsvr] Kicking off the LSVR (Link State Vector Routing) charter discussion
X-BeenThere: lsvr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Vector Routing <lsvr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsvr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsvr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 23:33:23 -0000

On January 18, 2018 at 6:15:41 PM, Robert Raszuk (robert@raszuk.net) wrote:

Robert:

Completely agreed on "rationale" part as far as forming WG. I was more
commenting on misleading community by setting up non wg forming bof just to
see it has suddenly resulted in forming two working groups.

It looks like we have different memories of what happened at the dcrouting
BOF [1].  Yes, it was tagged as non-WG-forming because the intent was not
to discuss a charter for what a dcrouting WG would do, but to discuss
potential work (rift and lsvr) and figure out whether there was interest in
working on them.  From where I stand, the intent was clear.

Note also that a BOF is not needed to form a WG [rfc2418].

Thanks!

Alvaro.
[1]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/materials/minutes-100-dcrouting/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email