Re: [Lsvr] Kicking off the LSVR (Link State Vector Routing) charter discussion

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Fri, 26 January 2018 04:46 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B971312D94D for <lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 20:46:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, WEIRD_QUOTING=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LKH6b1hopslr for <lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 20:46:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DF2E12422F for <lsvr@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 20:46:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id i186so18512140wmi.4 for <lsvr@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 20:46:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=R0Ni/9zaA9tqArqmz5xpY0/qwKD6U29cl0gzYGKpEYo=; b=aODPHe2icPiWFqtd6K4PHFvYfmTqfOc+dXXFpK3mkVuJCA0vwx5bgbrTeK/n2y8nza 4iwGDas1BLBPaxfVN3XLkmftmWitXyGcExPXvUMn1rEVAh4vzkVPemskPlQk0mX59ZaL Snf1ylw8c1FKYF1fKTR2OFW6ERvRmKqPl15/WS85m4QWpv7nc35k6LEeQwnhVqUxdTvF v8ASSobtFC2mRU8pzv75156I7OoW4+SBr+pH3uOX8nSIA9tJEm/7DOQ4HZSxMHjLXU6m b0Bps6+TKNFBY5onTGCUK9aI7/eKkdXoFTSYZ2hvG54F9iDuIGJt+BsOqHmGK4IfHqIG 3wpA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=R0Ni/9zaA9tqArqmz5xpY0/qwKD6U29cl0gzYGKpEYo=; b=P3JGclW+6GozRjJ82hn1zNCA955yCCq3d4ye5Qt+CIdrQwaTX1oqh7lpQe5LIeNn1x I3qeu0hVHZ9MVRQdQVz6BghkGL1IPpaQFL6UL2+nK7/egKWD2E5uVcxIJeD7Mp+MJChb vpS+CXa0io/JUiU1y77h9TIUPhDxRZd44AtirQ27DuNi9T59jgHCZJPoNK0H7oF+53Xi Mw7+jOTgc5ELwdO2RKHgKTqEMLUqGK1e2R8BzYOiYh3KPREeXnfOZsJtRGjcHBPs0VLa RWxceyTPBmmQBjbFeasSbhRImuAHSGPT18o1bBi7/D7IQqAAYhu1EvgahzSacEL1FCqz 8U7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytcoKqkqP3he9IT4Zpr5ybgJgLiNp/wXsj68kD7eF3OGk2kiraWv RW22oH4hcPJOSLafdUebHxEgJNEwTB/kaL47XYTR6rEE
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2267HjwYfOqpE3Bk7MENFnQsZZPgUFAraNa4THmHelTv40ATZfb6GUIzXBHgBPv4XMhxEAVlz4nAGu8GXF5kTe0=
X-Received: by 10.80.206.88 with SMTP id k24mr33108413edj.153.1516941976207; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 20:46:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.182.239 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 20:45:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <m2k1w5loyu.wl-randy@psg.com>
References: <AM5PR0701MB2836FFBB9A9F6C3D7C3C7122E0110@AM5PR0701MB2836.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <f590456ccee0498eadbb5fa4e4e048cc@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com> <m2shatlqsd.wl-randy@psg.com> <e7462ad1b5044442a40a505a8d8602c3@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com> <m2k1w5loyu.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 20:45:35 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hPFtmcX9=D8pk20oXC84i+BZTaxy+Pvg=7dELX+_ckEpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>, "lsvr@ietf.org" <lsvr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1b26d4a305710563a69361"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsvr/3o7LBUuE_JM1vC6T0SmgS6clSro>
Subject: Re: [Lsvr] Kicking off the LSVR (Link State Vector Routing) charter discussion
X-BeenThere: lsvr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Vector Routing <lsvr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsvr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsvr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 04:46:20 -0000

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> >>> Should  LSVR introduce a grouping in the way that OSPF has areas and
> >>> ISIS has levels?
> >> to what purpose?
> > For scalability.
>
> i thought that is why we were using bgp.  if it can't scale to this,
> then let's go to the other tony.
>

Randy, my name is Zaphod now ... Would you like the current read out
of the improbability factor?


                      oooo$$$$$$$$$$$$oooo
                      oo$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$o
                   oo$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$o         o$   $$ o$
   o $ oo        o$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$o       $$ $$ $$o$
oo $ $ "$      o$$$$$$$$$    $$$$$$$$$$$$$    $$$$$$$$$o       $$$o$$o$
"$$$$$$o$     o$$$$$$$$$      $$$$$$$$$$$      $$$$$$$$$$o    $$$$$$$$
  $$$$$$$    $$$$$$$$$$$      $$$$$$$$$$$      $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
  $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$    $$$$$$$$$$$$$    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$  """$$$
   "$$$""""$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$     "$$$
    $$$   o$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$     "$$$o
   o$$"   $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$       $$$o
   $$$    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$" "$$$$$$ooooo$$$$o
  o$$$oooo$$$$$  $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$   o$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
  $$$$$$$$"$$$$   $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$     $$$$""""""""
 """"       $$$$    "$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$"      o$$$
            "$$$o     """$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$"$$"         $$$
              $$$o          "$$""$$$$$$""""           o$$$
               $$$$o                                o$$$"
                "$$$$o      o$$$$$$o"$$$$o        o$$$$
                  "$$$$$oo     ""$$$$o$$$$$o   o$$$$""
                     ""$$$$$oooo  "$$$o$$$$$$$$$"""
                        ""$$$$$$$oo $$$$$$$$$$
                                """"$$$$$$$$$$$
                                    $$$$$$$$$$$$
                                     $$$$$$$$$$"
                                      "$$$""""


--- tony