Re: [manet] Fwd: Call for acceptance as Working Group documents

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Thu, 19 January 2017 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED5212945A for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:49:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.657
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.657 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.156, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZOcfmaHumO89 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:49:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.39.168]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F0A711293DB for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:49:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 14719 invoked by uid 0); 19 Jan 2017 16:49:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw2) (10.0.90.83) by gproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2017 16:49:10 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw2 with id aGp51u00V2SSUrH01Gp8L1; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 09:49:09 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=J7g5smXS c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=IgFoBzBjUZAA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=-JXR2q-7F0x2GqfyFLgA:9 a=WaTAf8e11ZRRhxY8:21 a=b86-bn6J2fbeTsAL:21 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=JPbjMjx8mw8A:10 a=6kGIvZw6iX1k4Y-7sg4_:22 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=RFcRYbJRPGgUw0EgOJDGSjnabOcQeSYggZ9UeUsddmg=; b=C8Rde0e9qHM6F+r+z/o6V8HHf6 bcJlKCd/3OUqW3/xXPeFI7kwPZIJFNbN2DKNKOSo3+qHTXUoM3OiyxTY2u4WNeT/RLcIlmW+rO8ZZ k+OuO4FFDKGmtIz/yx9MBBBFL;
Received: from pool-100-15-85-191.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.85.191]:43227 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1cUFta-0000gF-Ub; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 09:49:07 -0700
To: Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com>, MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
References: <CALtoyokY4GE1LHeGjUXmrHT-TF+=t=QcLuzLpcs7pLBm0RDURQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALtoyokhJPhGdv_-wrGdJsHU=vu75DADU6VjZvV6BZZJtU17Rw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <67fbb872-c2c6-19ec-c0c6-40a21600f959@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:49:03 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALtoyokhJPhGdv_-wrGdJsHU=vu75DADU6VjZvV6BZZJtU17Rw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.85.191
X-Exim-ID: 1cUFta-0000gF-Ub
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-85-191.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.85.191]:43227
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 19
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/LQ-zh97q4Fghj0iCgDYV3ySbyfA>
Subject: Re: [manet] Fwd: Call for acceptance as Working Group documents
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 16:49:14 -0000

Stan,

    Is it safe to assume that those who responded in support, don't need
to restate their position?

Thanks,

Lou


On 1/19/2017 11:19 AM, Stan Ratliff wrote:
> WG participants,
>
> Based on earlier complaints, we held off accepting these as WG
> documents. The concerns about the "log jam" of documents appears to be
> resolved, so I'm restarting this request. Please let the chairs know
> your thoughts on acceptance by Feb 2. 
>
> Regards,
> Stan
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Stan Ratliff* <ratliffstan@gmail.com
> <mailto:ratliffstan@gmail.com>>
> Date: Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:26 AM
> Subject: Call for acceptance as Working Group documents
> To: MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org <mailto:manet@ietf.org>>
>
>
> Hello working group participants,
>
> One of the items identified during the WG meeting in Seoul was to
> formally request, via the list, Working Group adoption of 5 extension
> drafts related to DLEP. This email is that formal request. 
>
> The drafts are: 
> 1.
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-latency-extension-00.html
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-latency-extension-00.html>
> 2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-pause-extension-00
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-pause-extension-00>
> 3. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-multi-hop-extension-00
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-multi-hop-extension-00>
> 4. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension-00
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension-00>
>
> I have put all 4 extensions on this email for expediency only; please
> do not assume that they must be adopted as a group. The chairs would
> greatly appreciate thoughts from the WG, both positive and negative.
>
> For purposes of determining WG consensus, a lack of a response will be
> seen as indicating support for adopting the draft (e.g. silence ==
> acceptance). 
>
> Regards,
> Stan
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet