Re: [mmox] The Story So Far...
"Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)" <infinity@lindenlab.com> Tue, 17 February 2009 23:42 UTC
Return-Path: <infinity@lindenlab.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328FD3A6AF9 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:42:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.441
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.441 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.157, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_MILLIONSOF=0.315]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RAbHA+pBQf0O for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:41:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tammy.lindenlab.com (tammy.lindenlab.com [64.154.223.128]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C64A3A6A8A for <mmox@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:41:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from regression.lindenlab.com (regression.lindenlab.com [10.1.16.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tammy.lindenlab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18AC7141405F; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:42:09 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <B8A94709-07E4-4FF8-B321-A4123E9DC633@lindenlab.com>
From: "Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)" <infinity@lindenlab.com>
To: "Hurliman, John" <john.hurliman@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933D501FDC38@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:42:08 -0800
References: <1E40CE05-15D1-4970-9B0F-CD4AD11A074A@lindenlab.com> <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933D501FDC38@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
Cc: "mmox@ietf.org" <mmox@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mmox] The Story So Far...
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:42:01 -0000
On Feb 17, 2009, at 3:09 PM, Hurliman, John wrote: >> While there is plenty to do and discuss in order to develop OGP >> into a >> fully workable protocol, we think it represents an initial shared >> vision >> of an interoperable protocol and hope it can evolve and grow in the >> context of this group. >> >> - Mark Lentczner >> >> [1] http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Open_Grid_Protocol > > It's great to see the amount of work that is being brought to the > table by Linden Lab and the Linden Lab Architecture Working Group > (AWG) participants, and I hope as much of it as possible can be used > to build an MMOX standard. I've been working on an LLIDL > implementation among other things based on what Linden Lab has > submitted as draft material. awesome! > It's my understanding that Open Grid Protocol (OGP) is a Linden Lab > project; part of the Linden Lab AWG which had no active contributors > that were also active developers of libSecondLife/libOpenMetaverse > or OpenSim during the time the OGP protocols were designed. The > "agent domain" concept in OGP terminology brings in a host of > assumptions that are diametrically opposed to the goals of > libOpenMetaverse and OpenSim (supporting millions of independent > administrative domains and service providers). huh? there were a number of non-lindens who participated in the development of OGP. the AWG does not, nor did it ever disallow participation by libSL or libOMV contributors / committers. last summer we demonstrated interoperability between Linden Lab's servers and an OpenSim instance. we hope that members of the libSL and libOMV teams will participate in MMOX. the concept of an agent domain was defined explicitly to support many different independent administrative domains. that is... though the interoperability test last summer used the Linden agent domain, the specification does not mandate a single agent domain. in fact, i believe Christian Scholz (a non-linden) implemented his own Agent Domain based on code from the PyOGP project. There is also frequent mention in AWG meetings of an upcoming C# implementation of an Agent Domain, again by a non Linden-Lab employee.
- [mmox] The Story So Far... Mark Lentczner
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Hurliman, John
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Gareth Nelson
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Hurliman, John
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Christian Scholz
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Gareth Nelson
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Hurliman, John
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Christian Scholz
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Hurliman, John
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Christian Scholz
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Gareth Nelson
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Kajikawa Jeremy
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Lawson English
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Lawson English
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Suzy Deffeyes
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Hurliman, John
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Dan Olivares
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Dan Olivares
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Lawson English
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Jesrad
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Kajikawa Jeremy
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Jesrad
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Hurliman, John
- [mmox] where is identity @ in all this? Mark P. McCahill
- Re: [mmox] where is identity @ in all this? Hurliman, John
- Re: [mmox] where is identity @ in all this? Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] where is identity @ in all this? Hurliman, John
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] The Story So Far... Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] where is identity @ in all this? Christian Scholz
- Re: [mmox] where is identity @ in all this? Jesrad
- Re: [mmox] where is identity @ in all this? Christian Scholz
- Re: [mmox] where is identity @ in all this? Kajikawa Jeremy
- Re: [mmox] where is identity @ in all this? Hurliman, John
- Re: [mmox] where is identity @ in all this? Gareth Nelson
- Re: [mmox] where is identity @ in all this? Lawson English
- Re: [mmox] where is identity @ in all this? Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] where is identity @ in all this? Christian Scholz