Re: draft-ietf-mmusic-sip-session-timer-00.txt

Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen@dnrc.bell-labs.com> Fri, 12 February 1999 18:48 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-confctrl>
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by zephyr.isi.edu (8.8.7/8.8.6) id KAA13146 for confctrl-outgoing; Fri, 12 Feb 1999 10:48:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tnt.isi.edu (tnt.isi.edu [128.9.128.128]) by zephyr.isi.edu (8.8.7/8.8.6) with ESMTP id KAA13141 for <confctrl@zephyr.isi.edu>; Fri, 12 Feb 1999 10:48:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dirty.research.bell-labs.com (dirty.research.bell-labs.com [204.178.16.6]) by tnt.isi.edu (8.8.7/8.8.6) with SMTP id KAA13347 for <confctrl@isi.edu>; Fri, 12 Feb 1999 10:48:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nova.dnrc.bell-labs.com ([135.180.131.5]) by dirty; Fri Feb 12 13:46:45 EST 1999
Received: from dnrc.bell-labs.com (arrakis [135.180.130.41]) by nova.dnrc.bell-labs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA18161; Fri, 12 Feb 1999 13:42:44 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <36C475A0.CFAFC36F@dnrc.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 13:40:32 -0500
From: Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen@dnrc.bell-labs.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Vipin Palawat <vipinpal@wipsys.soft.net>
CC: Francois Menard Distribution List Management Account <fm-listproc@mediatrix.com>, 'iptel@lists.research.bell-labs.com', confctrl@ISI.EDU, 'Douglas Clowes' <dclowes@ozemail.com.au>, Steven.R.Donovan@mci.com
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-mmusic-sip-session-timer-00.txt
References: <01aa01be5695$6adc7060$c21aa4a4@vipin.wipsys.soft.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-confctrl@zephyr.isi.edu
Precedence: bulk

Vipin Palawat wrote:
> 
> Hello Francois,
> 
> I can tell you how H.323 gatekeeper keeps track of Call duration .
> 
> There is one IRR message which keeps on coming from the endpoint which
> actually says that 'I am alive '. The frequency of this IRR message is also
> decided by gatekeeper in ACF message.
> Now if gatekeeper does not get this IRR message within the specified time
> then he can also request for status of endpoint by sending IRQ message for
> which if he does'nt get IRR then he can assume the endpoint to be dead and
> note down the time. Thus he can very well bill the endpoint based on time.In
> this case he don't have to bother about reregistration of endpoint .

So, if I'm writing H.323 client software, and I simply don't send IRR or
respond to IRQ, the gatekeeper thinks I'm down, the billing stops, and I
get cheap phone calls?

> 
> For packet based billing he can route the RTCP packets (which are of course
> not the media stream) to get the information regarding RTP packets.

RTCP packets are sent along with media packets (same address, one port
higher), and are end to end. Are you saying that they get rerouted to
gatekeepers?

-Jonathan R.


-- 
Jonathan D. Rosenberg                       Lucent Technologies
Member of Technical Staff                   101 Crawfords Corner Rd.
High Speed Networks Research                Holmdel, NJ 07733
FAX:   (732) 834-5379                       Rm. 4C-526
EMAIL: jdrosen@bell-labs.com
URL: http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~jdrosen