IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] New Version Notification for draft-daley-gendispatch-venue-requirements-02.txt

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Sat, 02 March 2024 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF47C14F691 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Mar 2024 08:32:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zNeOe03eFXZc for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Mar 2024 08:32:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [IPv6:2a00:bd80:aa::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49D5CC14F60E for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Mar 2024 08:32:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1709397119; bh=MHLg2eB+UEKy3aMm4b7rK72d/P5vmJ4IjxSZW5dJuQs=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=booIvx9x5L01wNf2oVrssyaX4JTyJPvXY41KZzXpS6m6MzSnec2bb2Nv1+QJzMb3L o8CrpgaFPkXqtbhWcA8TK/8qVZn8LgeciRW9zYW+UsvqPGI/AnptWfp68DrT3bpFd3 GtwsLYU36RFHMOpB7umhTjUHsONmsh1hE1H7cAqo=
Received: from [192.168.0.99] (77-58-144-232.dclient.hispeed.ch [77.58.144.232]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-22ubuntu3) with ESMTPSA id 422GVwav2418229 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 2 Mar 2024 17:31:58 +0100
Message-ID: <035f3585-a0df-41cf-afdb-647e470e6f94@lear.ch>
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2024 17:31:57 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Benson Muite <benson_muite@emailplus.org>
Cc: mtgvenue@ietf.org
References: <20240229190603.4E224842AE6E@ary.qy> <73C7B5D1-22CD-4CFA-8A6F-D1A75EE120D3@mnot.net> <8140ac05-63dc-1701-209f-6de9d45cb759@taugh.com> <2EBD8C64-E02F-4520-B45B-CFCE7805539E@mnot.net> <CABcZeBMA_b6pu4+rQC8nsXwOX8WX+9eaPnej778-=QhMxOwC9Q@mail.gmail.com> <fac34d30-5c82-9033-9450-e446e200e54c@emailplus.org> <CABcZeBN-Vn=Gwq8QJ4d4xgrCVDFqteNLRrG54PUp2VCTMn2NAw@mail.gmail.com> <9ade8583-1ab9-4be0-8b90-f4dbff6834ae@lear.ch> <804d4dd3-d4ce-6078-3893-df1b02d7c404@taugh.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
Autocrypt: addr=lear@lear.ch; keydata= xsBNBFMe1UQBCADdYOS5APDpIpF2ohAxB+nxg1GpAYr8iKwGIb86Wp9NkK5+QwbW9H035clT lpVLciExtN8E3MCTPOIm7aITPlruixAVwlBY3g7U9eRppSw9O2H/7bie2GOnYxqmsw4v1yNZ 9NcMLlD8raY0UcQ5r698c8JD4xUTLqybZXaK2sPeJkxzT+IwupRSQ+vXEvFFGhERQ88zo5Ca Sa1Gw/Rv54oH0Dq2XYkO41rhxQ60BKZLZuQK1d9+1y3I+An3AJeD3AA31fJZD3H8YRKOBgqe ILPILbw1mM7gCtCjfvFCt6AFCwEsjITGx55ceoQ+t5B5XGYJEppMWsIFrwZsfbL+gP31ABEB AAHNGUVsaW90IExlYXIgPGxlYXJAbGVhci5jaD7CwI4EEwECADgCGwMCHgECF4AWIQSY0L2Q Rh2wkqeyYR2HtmtG2dJ6MwUCWxJwMwULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgIDAQAKCRCHtmtG2dJ6M8KI B/46pFrJX+4Ockl2fHR303ais9Lyx8jv6mXKKOr8WR0UYcJ0syQrhaaZNG1VV98tYQHHK9F5 y7hH4YCsrr3odZ6zoavnx5X1X/2xw8y732f/irVoOOkYLid9IGPxa2e2nYXCZpde5/yvv3we XVE4mG4dEAD5T8iKS4Hz/3fKGJQ15o79Jv92HgC7RpCt0WaiQ0b6acP3PuwjDJzJzLFZzb7j IiB3izxQESSWE1GNRmoAK/k0gW6kmx1/87tQENrK+3Nn4CJSFQWF6entLnY7UeVm95wbMQkJ evwddDWUO2huDbmZnmxgKXGzSSpuNq7n8ICAOlbt0HfdJAZQfy25bwvezsBNBFMe1UQBCAC0 WV7Ydbv95xYGPhthTdChBIpPtl7JPCV/c6/3iEmvjpfGuFNaK4Macj9le20EA5A1BH7PgLGo HOiPM65NysRpZ96RRVX3TNfLmhGMFr5hPOGNdq+xcGHVutmwPV9U7bKeUNRiPFx3YdEkExdd qV2E8FltT0x2FSKe2xszPPHB6gVtMckX5buI9p1K3fbVhXdvEkcYY/jB0JEJGyhS5aEbct5c HUvDAkT81/YFK5Jfg8RRwu1q1t1YuIJSOWAZQ9J9oUsg6D9RpClU+tIFBoe3iTp1AUfJcypu cGKgLYKtpu/aygcpQONHYkYW5003mPsrajFhReVF5veycMbHs4u5ABEBAAHCwF8EGAECAAkF AlMe1UQCGwwACgkQh7ZrRtnSejOSuQgA27p2rYB7Kh20dym6V8c62pWpBHHTgxr/32zevxHS iXl6xvUCg5T8WUwfUk8OvgDcBErK/blDAMXQzSg3sp450JhR8RnXHXF5Zz2T04X7HnlIVJGw f2CjnwyEAJCqMzaCmI+g3Imvg/8L4nyBFvhlFHDv+kIvMiujyycjPAu7xxKplBs1/IEwmDoA MjneFmawvfeQnwdMhSKK8PjKSuzGU5uUmxj3GBfRqvTM0qpmhMPFOmDhJSmH55HLAky2Mlmq JYXJPt/9EfSEhFiua1M6gLiuNEuPkp+8jcnHQqKr0IeHt8UqcwLt2mGfIyl0FVdF9hvWPjNR zGbgqoT1Di03RQ==
In-Reply-To: <804d4dd3-d4ce-6078-3893-df1b02d7c404@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------daUWtO960vXSMr4tkMswgQql"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/dKERk6NhM1tAv9CTqDkaEZTKMgw>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] New Version Notification for draft-daley-gendispatch-venue-requirements-02.txt
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IETF meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2024 16:32:14 -0000

Hi John,

On 02.03.2024 17:16, John R Levine wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Mar 2024, Eliot Lear wrote:
>> India or China are interesting cases where the engagement has been 
>> there for quite some time.  The causality in this case would seem to 
>> argue for us going to those places, assuming the venue conditions are 
>> met.  That, it turns out, is a big assumption.
>
> ICANN met in Hyderabad and got no meaningful local participation I 
> could see.  There were a thousand local registrants but they were all 
> there for the literal free lunch. 

My point was not that we would drive new participation, but that we 
already have people from these countries who participate in the IETF.

>
> I think we agree that while we should be looking for a broader range 
> of places to meet, the first priority has to be that the meetings are 
> successful and we get our work done.
>
Absolutely.  Thus my last sentence.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email