IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] New Version Notification for draft-daley-gendispatch-venue-requirements-02.txt

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 01 March 2024 02:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F08EC14F5F8 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:19:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b="b1h276Ie"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="EVb40E7e"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UYBgXaD2kWOH for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:19:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wfhigh7-smtp.messagingengine.com (wfhigh7-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.158]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 629D4C14F5FA for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:19:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfhigh.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361C818000C4; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 21:19:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 29 Feb 2024 21:19:32 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1709259571; x=1709345971; bh=AOyKvj63pn5MS7QOLhTJwhBmaHtocZb9FEjq2Hxn3J0=; b= b1h276IerP3EKANyxydjfDIwlwmQ5wLYQDK6q8StVWw2WBGoRqImWdSUdBHhjYAM 9wzKRrOGLfw2W3Kgo7Aq0bKNL/i+sLI64yn7M2VF5d8D4YroZZfVEFZ1q9gAiOpy x2BcoBPMMYAPaENEFmNRni6vu90LikKiBtLOMH7W2Bd9z2ONd7xcoBDQIGfe9Qx7 LKpbCTKvvBsk6YucF7r9vyFJZK/icim4HHb4W1pHac9mD4mjbjLze0ngHaVGhDyA igp8RmlVoeiDrWzVjvzjqHBjV6b21xEV7u0gADk4xYLsv8JZWTzqBLNqhVgAe5qZ rUBQntfw9zBH1bLOJ7e/CQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1709259571; x= 1709345971; bh=AOyKvj63pn5MS7QOLhTJwhBmaHtocZb9FEjq2Hxn3J0=; b=E Vb40E7e490Ec/xScKITejzdUoWcyHx/XMQhWTZrqh5NuFQef5a1TZKEEaTVc60mQ ORNu1uUM3byMwY29qhaFautMdachkEONk92ko5YrBhoVCvP7FO/z33h6aU5x6Hew yXhbyEkCUp/AO0Et/VZb56iK/Z4i3D63ATRq9VEe9FO12cpKeH6rWzE5zQEfANEZ Whmxw4mukFC5tpYui1UXAVkG/UGV1SJ9PUjvbOfuP2MCdzYmmezZpq0XJE0/jHiA VDLazFMk0gBWOLXbq/8z9qClBkX0zZesQ5BWWxtDb2rKgORDqUn4Lk5DgbZNFH2/ uuQfRO/jl70+lIh4e8xAQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:MzvhZcVYwNTu1KcuUwg0GBMlwiMY0iuL6x9DhpipXrC961r9zqY7xA> <xme:MzvhZQnmOFkA8fd8nikF2Kt2qC00fI8OCi8BoKyn9uyjhtggVMnkKMO3SkuCGcE8G WQ2k0riakRpeA0zjw>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:MzvhZQZgkvFzCSh5gvB-TSSa-2H8WNz8so3apoWYmY4AdVREydyoUaOsGCGJi9dZsFnd8wNS3AH3188KWrh3IQWz6LZF44NkFwN_wJxWtP5H-HEJ792oDU6M>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrhedtgdegvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjffevgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhk ucfpohhtthhinhhghhgrmhcuoehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpedttdeggfeuvedtudfgtdekffdugeevteffgeejlefhvdetvdeujeetgeeugeet teenucffohhmrghinhepmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenuc frrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:MzvhZbWyA1xT3o8IYkoGhVv07OoWsXf81iqkreSt7cn3q1ezfaisvA> <xmx:MzvhZWl5QXEZPFwUDTkgq9RxAM2ve7muWu2Li7A8__-QvQwXxnF67Q> <xmx:MzvhZQekp4fMaALjrkwKUwer54hDkWI1Tfd26t3vgBpN3TmXiQh9bQ> <xmx:MzvhZbzq0MM0R-rcoCFlJCGFjij5Dkxpv_kdIG2R1LCNyTJVwMkWKJG4cCM>
Feedback-ID: ie6694242:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 21:19:30 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <8140ac05-63dc-1701-209f-6de9d45cb759@taugh.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 13:19:26 +1100
Cc: mtgvenue@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2EBD8C64-E02F-4520-B45B-CFCE7805539E@mnot.net>
References: <20240229190603.4E224842AE6E@ary.qy> <73C7B5D1-22CD-4CFA-8A6F-D1A75EE120D3@mnot.net> <8140ac05-63dc-1701-209f-6de9d45cb759@taugh.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/kMsa5OcNAlSR1lJTAdhUECQdGsY>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] New Version Notification for draft-daley-gendispatch-venue-requirements-02.txt
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IETF meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 02:19:39 -0000


> On 1 Mar 2024, at 13:16, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> 
>>> No, it's not that simple. For example, we met once in Buenos Aires and
>>> found problems that a simple count wouldn't reflect, e.g., personal
>>> safety issues that made people who went say they wouldn't go back.
>> 
>> Funny, I encounter those issues often in the North American cities that we keep on returning to as well...
> 
> Someone we both know was mugged within a few blocks of the B.A. hotel.  I realize the US is not as safe as Australia, but how often does that happen in the places we meet in the US?

My understanding was that the same happened to an attendee in Philadelphia. Not sure about San Francisco, but let's just say it wouldn't be surprising...

> BA had other issues, not a lot of local attendees, only place I ever got counterfeit money from a bank ATM.  I like the city but I don't think it would be a good place to meet again.

It's always going to depend on priorities -- YMMV.

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email