IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] New Version Notification for draft-daley-gendispatch-venue-requirements-02.txt

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Sat, 02 March 2024 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47737C14F5EA for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Mar 2024 07:56:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00PvsiWbJk3n for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Mar 2024 07:56:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [IPv6:2a00:bd80:aa::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BCFEC14EB17 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Mar 2024 07:56:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1709394956; bh=j51ZPZrGIEJWz5CxKeIs5jzF4bBB74O55JrmVO2lf88=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=UztpPmbg7yroowY8lI9+xBr9Drglx4UTpzD3DOy15t5h3hkVbEQl7pmMb58Wavr5u xU7/t8C87zmODlP35V2KomUtquG48GDwwg6YjFzla45iVWuLw1KLtwZQhLJ4mO2q40 MspWdfxssoM3KVfs0kqJt8M1vGLunB3hJxlhJcfw=
Received: from [192.168.0.99] (77-58-144-232.dclient.hispeed.ch [77.58.144.232]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-22ubuntu3) with ESMTPSA id 422FtsHF2408432 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 2 Mar 2024 16:55:55 +0100
Message-ID: <9ade8583-1ab9-4be0-8b90-f4dbff6834ae@lear.ch>
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2024 16:55:53 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Benson Muite <benson_muite@emailplus.org>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot=40mnot.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, mtgvenue@ietf.org
References: <20240229190603.4E224842AE6E@ary.qy> <73C7B5D1-22CD-4CFA-8A6F-D1A75EE120D3@mnot.net> <8140ac05-63dc-1701-209f-6de9d45cb759@taugh.com> <2EBD8C64-E02F-4520-B45B-CFCE7805539E@mnot.net> <CABcZeBMA_b6pu4+rQC8nsXwOX8WX+9eaPnej778-=QhMxOwC9Q@mail.gmail.com> <fac34d30-5c82-9033-9450-e446e200e54c@emailplus.org> <CABcZeBN-Vn=Gwq8QJ4d4xgrCVDFqteNLRrG54PUp2VCTMn2NAw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
Autocrypt: addr=lear@lear.ch; keydata= xsBNBFMe1UQBCADdYOS5APDpIpF2ohAxB+nxg1GpAYr8iKwGIb86Wp9NkK5+QwbW9H035clT lpVLciExtN8E3MCTPOIm7aITPlruixAVwlBY3g7U9eRppSw9O2H/7bie2GOnYxqmsw4v1yNZ 9NcMLlD8raY0UcQ5r698c8JD4xUTLqybZXaK2sPeJkxzT+IwupRSQ+vXEvFFGhERQ88zo5Ca Sa1Gw/Rv54oH0Dq2XYkO41rhxQ60BKZLZuQK1d9+1y3I+An3AJeD3AA31fJZD3H8YRKOBgqe ILPILbw1mM7gCtCjfvFCt6AFCwEsjITGx55ceoQ+t5B5XGYJEppMWsIFrwZsfbL+gP31ABEB AAHNGUVsaW90IExlYXIgPGxlYXJAbGVhci5jaD7CwI4EEwECADgCGwMCHgECF4AWIQSY0L2Q Rh2wkqeyYR2HtmtG2dJ6MwUCWxJwMwULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgIDAQAKCRCHtmtG2dJ6M8KI B/46pFrJX+4Ockl2fHR303ais9Lyx8jv6mXKKOr8WR0UYcJ0syQrhaaZNG1VV98tYQHHK9F5 y7hH4YCsrr3odZ6zoavnx5X1X/2xw8y732f/irVoOOkYLid9IGPxa2e2nYXCZpde5/yvv3we XVE4mG4dEAD5T8iKS4Hz/3fKGJQ15o79Jv92HgC7RpCt0WaiQ0b6acP3PuwjDJzJzLFZzb7j IiB3izxQESSWE1GNRmoAK/k0gW6kmx1/87tQENrK+3Nn4CJSFQWF6entLnY7UeVm95wbMQkJ evwddDWUO2huDbmZnmxgKXGzSSpuNq7n8ICAOlbt0HfdJAZQfy25bwvezsBNBFMe1UQBCAC0 WV7Ydbv95xYGPhthTdChBIpPtl7JPCV/c6/3iEmvjpfGuFNaK4Macj9le20EA5A1BH7PgLGo HOiPM65NysRpZ96RRVX3TNfLmhGMFr5hPOGNdq+xcGHVutmwPV9U7bKeUNRiPFx3YdEkExdd qV2E8FltT0x2FSKe2xszPPHB6gVtMckX5buI9p1K3fbVhXdvEkcYY/jB0JEJGyhS5aEbct5c HUvDAkT81/YFK5Jfg8RRwu1q1t1YuIJSOWAZQ9J9oUsg6D9RpClU+tIFBoe3iTp1AUfJcypu cGKgLYKtpu/aygcpQONHYkYW5003mPsrajFhReVF5veycMbHs4u5ABEBAAHCwF8EGAECAAkF AlMe1UQCGwwACgkQh7ZrRtnSejOSuQgA27p2rYB7Kh20dym6V8c62pWpBHHTgxr/32zevxHS iXl6xvUCg5T8WUwfUk8OvgDcBErK/blDAMXQzSg3sp450JhR8RnXHXF5Zz2T04X7HnlIVJGw f2CjnwyEAJCqMzaCmI+g3Imvg/8L4nyBFvhlFHDv+kIvMiujyycjPAu7xxKplBs1/IEwmDoA MjneFmawvfeQnwdMhSKK8PjKSuzGU5uUmxj3GBfRqvTM0qpmhMPFOmDhJSmH55HLAky2Mlmq JYXJPt/9EfSEhFiua1M6gLiuNEuPkp+8jcnHQqKr0IeHt8UqcwLt2mGfIyl0FVdF9hvWPjNR zGbgqoT1Di03RQ==
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBN-Vn=Gwq8QJ4d4xgrCVDFqteNLRrG54PUp2VCTMn2NAw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------vIlbpFXtlKwXQbJ3fI6q57HJ"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/fc_IZpmCjJkmAsz5Vms_wDV9u08>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] New Version Notification for draft-daley-gendispatch-venue-requirements-02.txt
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IETF meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2024 15:56:12 -0000

Well...

On 02.03.2024 15:27, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
> My understanding of the data is that previous exploratory meetings in 
> areas
> where there was believed to be low engagement did not in fact meaningfully
> grow the number of new participants beyond that one meeting..
> Do you have evidence to the contrary?

India or China are interesting cases where the engagement has been there 
for quite some time.  The causality in this case would seem to argue for 
us going to those places, assuming the venue conditions are met.  That, 
it turns out, is a big assumption.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email