Re: [Mtgvenue] New Version Notification for draft-daley-gendispatch-venue-requirements-02.txt

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 01 March 2024 02:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D71C14F6A8 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:31:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TnbvI4nBNSOb for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:31:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb34.google.com (mail-yb1-xb34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2829C14F61C for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:31:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb34.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-dc6d24737d7so1702010276.0 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:31:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1709260276; x=1709865076; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=V15zYvUcmw66RhzPfNB59Uj+yIl3qibqi6BsZIcUdLo=; b=gfAFfcY4YAWkmKZquYM7YG21JZqSPiQUupmFZa9LjOUEAZdWHnsCaPmJh3bMhUzHiZ gq5u8chcMV6poPWOIZDdGzmubyzPx3Lyh7j+oXhs0aK8wrH81kwotBCsV3tRzTSguNrP R/zdvCX1sYri2ReaijBmh/qx4UtcZBjMcmPYpkhuCVG/PgctnOVKS9RMsyDLQjTntLoE q66S5ICE3vUfeIpPHjNfxufyUWWqv/g6kw1oXXNs/w8Q+hiybBCvwuk+wCQATwngXuZQ 8Imjy4tYTyGEWS+A810RzJOSBSoDjD/S2jyHV8nGzZtwGUSZW+8hIxxPu22IFIHsPWV/ 7Hjw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709260276; x=1709865076; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=V15zYvUcmw66RhzPfNB59Uj+yIl3qibqi6BsZIcUdLo=; b=QmSZWqF6BZiY7w8fT6Vd9hhJEnkw3RE3pqutPZJqRQqdQ0kA5omVRGOFNcdFiXDLUV /w9pRSRC2Ei0h7roC4MCOdrlm6xKt7BiVUjGOw1ZD1TLfXvXS1cjbLzCspiFuxwwwDVU 3YX3r9XltFJ1mfvZiLID8J2m93qt/beORYMxZsSr1sS4MQgUC/BojvRtTT0C6HhobCW6 kUFTVUtzZJPLcANDbKYv9Vx/av+CFZZp8Q1JcjQYEErMBoL0diuQluHo486X2TvihP4S MQHJ0vN56cqcLku4JIJtoDXiKqPD+qXsG3y37wmcxIKkpZAVdYXcoIaj+frK3X3pShpN u5MA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWfFV9iLYsRUqkcNub7YE5BhxhTFMJtH/444OGPdfYL1cQ3ydkJMRPJzSXCQZBcw6WAv3qvIitPxrbQtZbC749j7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzw7ZytHny0sxaiOW+j4ezdE6Q+6zf0dVBrPVK4cVKiLl5SI7mg B7vTylOpgWJCaxfFqPCSz4XtqZx/MbMLlO3QJtHIZueIKIeTZlQ9CS8dJqP75KwBQjSXHf8W3cx 6FkzebNnoEXdGfgOdkwgWH0acNeYQxDWe9W62i03ASsi32StNRGs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFYsHKnH8A5x9qPA56dtg4HrRDCQXy11f163G01K+tO1jmrSwTJRoHl/lm9allXmQNIRQYets7pEEs9mWeBtMA=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:bacd:0:b0:dcc:fe97:f899 with SMTP id a13-20020a25bacd000000b00dccfe97f899mr248677ybk.24.1709260276438; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:31:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240229190603.4E224842AE6E@ary.qy> <73C7B5D1-22CD-4CFA-8A6F-D1A75EE120D3@mnot.net> <8140ac05-63dc-1701-209f-6de9d45cb759@taugh.com> <2EBD8C64-E02F-4520-B45B-CFCE7805539E@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <2EBD8C64-E02F-4520-B45B-CFCE7805539E@mnot.net>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:30:39 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMA_b6pu4+rQC8nsXwOX8WX+9eaPnej778-=QhMxOwC9Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot=40mnot.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, mtgvenue@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009b2f1c0612902b54"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/yjyrGAGld-tUEhFf4X10GrFo88I>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] New Version Notification for draft-daley-gendispatch-venue-requirements-02.txt
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IETF meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 02:31:37 -0000

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 6:19 PM Mark Nottingham <mnot=
40mnot.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

>
>
> > On 1 Mar 2024, at 13:16, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> No, it's not that simple. For example, we met once in Buenos Aires and
> >>> found problems that a simple count wouldn't reflect, e.g., personal
> >>> safety issues that made people who went say they wouldn't go back.
> >>
> >> Funny, I encounter those issues often in the North American cities that
> we keep on returning to as well...
> >
> > Someone we both know was mugged within a few blocks of the B.A. hotel.
> I realize the US is not as safe as Australia, but how often does that
> happen in the places we meet in the US?
>
> My understanding was that the same happened to an attendee in
> Philadelphia. Not sure about San Francisco, but let's just say it wouldn't
> be surprising...
>
> > BA had other issues, not a lot of local attendees, only place I ever got
> counterfeit money from a bank ATM.  I like the city but I don't think it
> would be a good place to meet again.
>
> It's always going to depend on priorities -- YMMV.
>

I think this is a good illustration of why it's difficult to come up with a
complete
set of objective criteria about the suitability of a specific venue.
Rather, I think
the right way to proceed is by having a smaller set of screening criteria
(as the current document does) and then asking whether a proposed new
venue is problematic for a large enough [0] fraction of attendees, for
whatever
reason, without interrogating the validity of those reasons.

With that said, I agree with John that time zone is not a good replacement
for our existing geographic zone system. I could imagine a new criterion
based on travel time, but I don't think time zone is a good choice for the
reasons John indicated.

-Ekr

[0] Where "large enough" is defined as "significantly more than for the
existing
venues"

>
> Cheers,
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mtgvenue mailing list
> Mtgvenue@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue
>