Re: [netmod] schema mount and YANG library

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> writes:

> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:05:15PM +0000, Robert Wilton wrote:
>> 
>> Hence, for me, I see the choice as:
>> 1) do we publish the existing model now (perhaps also mark the draft as
>> experimental) followed by an updated draft with the NMDA compatible module?
>> 2) do we publish both models in a single draft (e.g. with the existing model
>> in an appendix)?
>> 3) do we only publish a single version of the draft with an NMDA compliant
>> solution.
>>
>
> I think the situation is as follows (likely obvious but it may help to
> make sure we are all on the same page):
>
> - the NI and LNE models have a normative reference to
>   I-D.ietf-netmod-schema-mount (and this makes sense since there are
>   MUST sentences in the I-D)
>
> - I-D.ietf-netmod-schema-mount (last updated in October) has normative
>   references to RFC 7895 (old YANG library)
>
> - RFC 7895 does not work with NMDA, NMDA work on a YANG library update
>   replacing RFC 7895
>
> So the YANG library update is gating the schema mount update which is
> gating the publication of the NI and LNE models.
>
> A proper solution would be to prioritize work on the YANG library
> update and the schema mount update. I assume that the next revision of
> the YANG library update (say end of January) is ready for WG last call
> and perhaps the schema mount authors can take an effort to get that
> document there as well, say beginning of February.

I completely agree.

Lada

>
> /js
>
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

-- 
Ladislav Lhotka
Head, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67