Re: [netmod] schema mount and YANG library

[Kent Watsen <[e-mail]>]

>On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 08:25:35AM -0800, joel jaeggli wrote:
>> 
>> Perhaps I apply a different discount rate on the future particularly
>> when timelines are involved. e.g. 3 months turns into a year and half
>> pretty quickly.
>
> I provided a reasoning why 3 months may be feasible, I doubled it
> since its the IETF. You may apply the factor 6. But note that the last
> piece of NMDA (the YANG library) is work reasonably well understood
> with people dedicated to finish the last piece (obviously my very
> biased view).

I believe the issue isn't so much the timing on the YANG Library bis,
so much as the timing on having an updated schema-mount draft that 
is NMDA-compatible.


>> I think it's more a question of can we live with publishing the module
>> now as is? Or can  we not live with publishing it now?
>
> The question is what we expect implementors to do and how we think
> about achieving interoperability by publishing two significantly
> different versions instead of one.

Agreed, we will need to provide guidance with this approach.


Kent // nobody