IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] draft netmod charter update proposal

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Thu, 02 March 2017 13:47 UTC

Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3007D12953C; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 05:47:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.021
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BBKpQy-w30a4; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 05:47:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [217.31.204.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 522BA1298A6; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 05:47:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:718:1a02:1:141a:a9ee:9241:2ecb] (unknown [IPv6:2001:718:1a02:1:141a:a9ee:9241:2ecb]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7E996221A; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:47:36 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1488462456; bh=2pe7x+aVhLIzZdmf5NTqZVXUhWGb9++NerGdOtbps84=; h=From:Date:To; b=vPpUgxunv41K5ccG8JLEi5Y1eE+QsfmdSZ9JJJR4t9umiOWAZl2lDenI967LrLVG6 MWbVxlLH31XNPcpkFjSZjKwXfk8hnbARg1kb6fL6E1+D+Gc8zgyUxiBBs6XMv+bGcz NnjqGuTU7CliJtPZ/mMvPJR6N02sHrDoMODVAi3c=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20170301204008.GB354@elstar.local>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 14:47:36 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D96D3BD3-79CB-4504-8017-10319BB34B11@nic.cz>
References: <0830e87c-ee4f-bf53-2c51-96c166d3955e@cisco.com> <9A9AD440-953D-46D4-9207-97619D054912@juniper.net> <9d7b60aa-1690-c598-7034-2e430c7a8e0a@cisco.com> <3C31A53A-6818-451E-9BEF-5E568C4DCB65@juniper.net> <20170301080626.GC74969@elstar.local> <F29941EC-F118-4CCE-B295-824EC0C417CB@nic.cz> <20170301094629.GA75542@elstar.local> <05eb01d2927b$a75d2da0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <63B6599B-5295-4D88-AFA0-1A24890CF7C5@nic.cz> <94364DAA-43B4-464C-B824-B46CF1BE499C@juniper.net> <20170301204008.GB354@elstar.local>
To: Jürgen Schönwälder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Zf87WM4UudfiE4Rn0ttOa2fEVx4>
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] draft netmod charter update proposal
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 13:47:40 -0000

> On 1 Mar 2017, at 21:40, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:56:12PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote:
>> Hi Lada,
>> 
>> I understand your intention here, but I'm inclined to agree with others
>> that it's better to stick with the term we're using in the documents.
>> I'm open to the idea of changing the term used in our RFCs, and I believe
>> that such a change would likely have to begin with the YANG spec, from
>> which it could flow into other drafts.  With this in mind, I've added an
>> item to the yang-next tracker:
>> 
>>  https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-next/issues/17
>> 
>> and I plan to revert this change in the charter text.
> 
> Kent,
> 
> there either is a decision and plan to change terminology everywhere
> or this proposal is in my view a no go. Right now, we seem to use
> consistent terminology everywhere - I do not want to loose this
> property lightly.

I agree. If nobody else wants this change, I can live with "encoding", too.

Lada

> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email