IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Mandatory-to-implement token type

Blaine Cook <romeda@gmail.com> Mon, 12 December 2011 15:10 UTC

Return-Path: <romeda@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FFF421F8B74 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:10:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oh1pcfjfmQ47 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:10:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE94F21F8B70 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:10:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ggnk5 with SMTP id k5so6391281ggn.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:10:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=Z50GNkNMAsQSL9wiNPtzK8nBgDm7KcYag10eXpMA+i8=; b=UOmW3XAsBmyd8L2lTBgyv+RWBZFjLcbVcbl254nd+xqSCGOWIuZTxYnG9QzKEWallz hST0JMkJ3yrmj52+qnQcSblyBiwgKr8mRSk+xrzx6niNl+AEYb3rTOUf0Qb/TYq3Go8q Aef/dGK2Q6O2B8n1sWYA+gsMHiIrXBEm8GrpM=
Received: by 10.182.89.65 with SMTP id bm1mr3014105obb.58.1323702645163; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:10:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.114.68 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:10:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <C351DB69-72F0-49FF-84CB-015B48F26C23@mnt.se>
References: <CALaySJJ+2au5rxEQmSSpXO42KmgCu=NhiLPBCx-3AH0hud=5CQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAH-8B6sjim_tcBkTPFWc1SnjhtHDQTR7sVT+aOjnYv7cs8JssA@mail.gmail.com> <4ED82D62.3070800@cs.tcd.ie> <CALaySJLKYLpPWc14_GUJKc5j1E3QovKQOx9HsdR-n2YV7kstpQ@mail.gmail.com> <4ED89384.9060603@cs.tcd.ie> <CAC4RtVBQdV+dwhzK903nkeNhsKzrHNFPYMK+EZtxRXnHWGs68w@mail.gmail.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739435F7576DF@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <CAAz=sc=NMv-8Z4QDVCFAbcCoGtC0Zc84Sg+HCMEDOMOyiUsD3w@mail.gmail.com> <C351DB69-72F0-49FF-84CB-015B48F26C23@mnt.se>
From: Blaine Cook <romeda@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:10:24 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAz=scnb=XKiJXBDRjAgq4Km87Xbvbjfwf1EWod=Wpro8iX6oQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, oauth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Mandatory-to-implement token type
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:10:46 -0000

On 11 December 2011 11:30, Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> wrote:
>
> 5 dec 2011 kl. 00:34 skrev Blaine Cook <romeda@gmail.com>:
>
> Oauth 1.0a mac and 2.0 mac are not the same thing. Yours is an argument for backwards compat I think.

The syntax is different / better, the spec is cleaner, but they
specify exactly the same thing.

I couldn't care less about all this at this point, but I do take issue
with the claim that the MAC approach in general (as typified by OAuth
1.0a and the MAC Token draft as-is) doesn't have adoption.

b.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email