Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rechartering

[Mark Mcgloin <[e-mail]>]

What about Security Considerations. I know some individuals have worked on
it in the past - does it need a WG to complete


Mark McGloin

Hannes Tschofenig <[e-mail]>
Sent by: [e-mail]


12/09/2010 00:59


Hi all,

at the Washington Internet Identity Workshop we had the chance to chat
about OAuth. Given the progress on the main specification we should
discuss WG re-chartering.

The following items had been proposed at the meeting:

* Messaging Signing
Example: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg04250.html

* User Experience Extensions
Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-recordon-oauth-v2-ux/

* Artifact Binding
Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sakimura-oauth-requrl/

* SAML for OAuth
Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-campbell-oauth-saml/

* Recommendations of commonly used Scope values
No draft available (to my knowledge)

* Dynamic Client Registration
Example: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-oauth-dyn-reg-v1-00.txt

I am interested to hear
a) what items are important for you; we cannot work on everything at the
same time.
b) what items are you willing to co-author (requires a hard time
commitment)
c) what items are you willing to review
d) whether we should consider other items?

Btw, to have your work considered you have to submit an IETF draft.
Please use the Web tool to upload it:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/idst/upload.cgi
Also use the following filename convention:
draft-[author last name]-oauth-[some short name]-[version#].txt

Ciao
Hannes