Re: [ogpx] VWRAP is going no where.
Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com> Wed, 06 January 2010 16:53 UTC
Return-Path: <josh@lindenlab.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB573A68ED for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 08:53:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.487
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.487 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZQ62bDCKK6O3 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 08:53:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iw0-f195.google.com (mail-iw0-f195.google.com [209.85.223.195]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C7E3A687A for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 08:53:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so4216526iwn.29 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:52:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.146.2 with SMTP id f2mr525979ibv.23.1262796776001; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:52:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20100106142220.GA11321@alinoe.com>
References: <20100106142220.GA11321@alinoe.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:52:55 -0800
Message-ID: <f72742de1001060852q15715bc9m7536b239a3d8c6fc@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
To: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>, "ogpx@ietf.org" <ogpx@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e64c061641cf8f047c81c9a2"
Subject: Re: [ogpx] VWRAP is going no where.
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:53:03 -0000
I'm aware of a fair amount of implementation work happening right now, and Meadhbh is cranking on revisions to the LLSD/LLIDL draft. Yes, it's a bit quiet here, but I'm not too disturbed; there's a lot of writing/implementation to do to catch up to the state of discussions. That said... IETF77 is coming up in Anaheim, CA, USA on March 21-25. Sufficient interest has been expressed offline for us to have a WG meeting, and it's time to start thinking about an agenda for a session. I've been chatting offline with some of the draft authors about topics, but others who are planning to attend (physically or virtually) should start to think about what topics might benefit from real-time communication. Feel free to email me (or the list, of course) if you have a topic you're thinking of presenting, and want some early feedback on whether it makes sense for the agenda. (And speaking of attending virtually, I'm planning to run some trials in February to make sure we have the appropriate hardware and software for a mixed reality session. Volunteers for implementing chat relays, etc, would be appreciated.) On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> wrote: > The last message on this list was from 8 December > last year... one month of total silence. And even > that message was a "hey, is anything happening here?" > > I'm worried that without communication HERE, there will > be no consensus, and without consensus we'll have nothing; > VWRAP would be a failure. I'd like to point out that > if anyone is working on something behind closed doors > somewhere, then that isn't helping much to make any deadlines, > since any progress would mean agreement about things > on THIS list. > > -- > Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> > _______________________________________________ > ogpx mailing list > ogpx@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx >
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP is going no where. Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP is going no where. Lawson English
- [ogpx] VWRAP is going no where. Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP is going no where. Joshua Bell
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP is going no where. Vaughn Deluca
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP is going no where. Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP is going no where. Vaughn Deluca
- [ogpx] Second Life Bill Windwalker
- Re: [ogpx] Second Life Vaughn Deluca
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP is going no where. Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP is going no where. Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP is going no where. Dickson, Mike (ISS Software)
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP is going no where. Joshua Bell
- Re: [ogpx] Second Life Joshua Bell
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP is going no where. Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] Second Life Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP is going no where. Barry Leiba