Re: [ogpx] VWRAP is going no where.

Lawson English <lenglish5@cox.net> Thu, 07 January 2010 07:30 UTC

Return-Path: <lenglish5@cox.net>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829313A698B for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 23:30:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.74
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.74 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zam+cyUVxV4p for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 23:30:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fed1rmmtao106.cox.net (fed1rmmtao106.cox.net [68.230.241.40]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED723A67F4 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 23:30:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20100107073049.UERN18268.fed1rmmtao106.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 02:30:49 -0500
Received: from ip72-200-121-127.tc.ph.cox.net ([72.200.121.127]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id SXWp1d0012l1Ksg03XWpnk; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 02:30:49 -0500
X-VR-Score: -200.00
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=4cmh2gL1a6RJOvq2diO5/mV5P7W7DelkioqUudxRLMU= c=1 sm=1 a=dDMcEshkJXgA:10 a=Wajolswj7cQA:10 a=lHHFyFaL52RzbKbxZIYZqA==:17 a=P4y9z_DHBHGX4LlmBDgA:9 a=bInu8kDNhzaEqadSGIEA:7 a=CriKVdi4JMuOJsNwrUlry7V-NTMA:4 a=4AlmWKt_P-vcY-i8:21 a=n3zCQsHg8mHPtMjC:21 a=lHHFyFaL52RzbKbxZIYZqA==:117
X-CM-Score: 0.00
Message-ID: <4B458DA8.6050003@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:30:48 -0700
From: Lawson English <lenglish5@cox.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
References: <20100106142220.GA11321@alinoe.com> <f72742de1001060852q15715bc9m7536b239a3d8c6fc@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f72742de1001060852q15715bc9m7536b239a3d8c6fc@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "ogpx@ietf.org" <ogpx@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ogpx] VWRAP is going no where.
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lenglish5@cox.net
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 07:30:52 -0000

Joshua Bell wrote:
> I'm aware of a fair amount of implementation work happening right now, 
> and Meadhbh is cranking on revisions to the LLSD/LLIDL draft. Yes, 
> it's a bit quiet here, but I'm not too disturbed; there's a lot of 
> writing/implementation to do to catch up to the state of discussions.
>
> That said...
>
> IETF77 is coming up in Anaheim, CA, USA on March 21-25. Sufficient 
> interest has been expressed offline for us to have a WG meeting, and 
> it's time to start thinking about an agenda for a session. I've been 
> chatting offline with some of the draft authors about topics, but 
> others who are planning to attend (physically or virtually) should 
> start to think about what topics might benefit from real-time 
> communication.
>
> Feel free to email me (or the list, of course) if you have a topic 
> you're thinking of presenting, and want some early feedback on whether 
> it makes sense for the agenda.
>
> (And speaking of attending virtually, I'm planning to run some trials 
> in February to make sure we have the appropriate hardware and software 
> for a mixed reality session. Volunteers for implementing chat relays, 
> etc, would be appreciated.)

Y'all need to chat with the Metanomics/Science Friday folk. They have 
expressed interest in helping set up a mixed reality session for the 
IETF sessions along the lines of what they do for Metanomics and NPR's 
Science Friday and they have more experience than anyone else in SL (or 
in any other virtual world, I'm guessing) in doing that kind of thing.

Lawson