Re: [ogpx] VWRAP is going no where.

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 11 January 2010 03:27 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E709C3A69A2 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:27:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TuBVRO+y11zS for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:27:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9643A699F for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:27:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from squire.local (dsl-175-253.dynamic-dsl.frii.net [216.17.175.253]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49A8B40329; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:27:19 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4B4A9A95.3030604@stpeter.im>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:27:17 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>, ogpx@ietf.org
References: <20100106142220.GA11321@alinoe.com> <e0b04bba1001072033y223be42pf31b1e014674d665@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e0b04bba1001072033y223be42pf31b1e014674d665@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms010002060300000104040401"
Subject: Re: [ogpx] VWRAP is going no where.
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 03:27:24 -0000

On 1/7/10 9:33 PM, Morgaine wrote:

> I do however support your statement 100% about the work being done
> behind closed doors.

Some working groups (and pre-WGs, as with IDNAbis) delegate a small
design team to make faster progress, and such a design team often works
via private conference calls and the like. However, as far as I know,
there is no design team for the VWRAP WG. Therefore, IMHO all the work
should happen in as open a fashion as possible. Now, no one expects a
document author to use some sort of collaborative editing software so
that everyone can help out in real time. On the other hand there is a
great deal of expertise on this list regarding virtual worlds and I
would expect the document author to be engaging the list in a dialogue
regarding open issues, thorny problems to be solved, etc., as a way to
make progress on submitting an Internet-Draft. Publish early, publish often.

My $0.02.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/