Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations?
Meadhbh Hamrick <meadhbh.siobhan@gmail.com> Thu, 21 January 2010 18:05 UTC
Return-Path: <meadhbh.siobhan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D143A6A57 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:05:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BP7F5GS80Cu6 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:05:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pw0-f50.google.com (mail-pw0-f50.google.com [209.85.160.50]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B9F3A6AAD for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:05:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pwi20 with SMTP id 20so153445pwi.29 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:05:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z/Rb2udaED9gtgkdeudMLlydhh65eAvd7P6MgpzQ9To=; b=WWtbjUih65clcR+mWmdG+FjCJuGyU/ePWBev/9D+KkUKNNahKEp8c+lZtno7CIgW30 AjdQnPNYhsStOltRh1nWUuE3eNUQoDl6Jkw8ga9UmeBo+ANNGMwyCqpGFHKBDl9LzUzo 03dn5ZgxgagOIJOvApcp9vlJEkwyrsT+WXX8g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LsfnsUrN4jA/IKFRhAlHtV5LsQ1Sv/xh1MKoDhGdE1xUOQJfa65SDy0Nbx2YJAbivP juaKqXLq7C08Ejxr5cnPWN5SB8OvOWiAciMVQ460o1BRGfGjcPUBIek2f0druX6LcMVt Won7req6yxaHB4gCUYyp30xJhYcOYrNfLgiM0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.115.86.36 with SMTP id o36mr1209611wal.142.1264097107872; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:05:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933DC4B2DC80@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933DC4B2DC80@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:05:07 -0800
Message-ID: <b8ef0a221001211005l65f771edwa7eb1f228d9ee6fa@mail.gmail.com>
From: Meadhbh Hamrick <meadhbh.siobhan@gmail.com>
To: "Hurliman, John" <john.hurliman@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "ogpx@ietf.org" <ogpx@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations?
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:05:15 -0000
the seondlife URI scheme is a hack used to automagically launch the SL viewer based on web interaction like with the map @ slurl.com. as i read it, the point of a location URI in the protocol is to provide a mechanism for carrying information in a point in a virtual world. instead of abusing URIs like we have in the past, maybe we should define a LLIDL map for containing information about a location, then use more traditional URLs to point to the location of these services. so rather than have something like: secondlife://example.com/Levenhall/128/128/32 we would define a LLIDL map like: { region_name : string, location : [ int, int, int ] } and then serialize it as: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <llsd> <map> <key>region_name</key> <string>Levenhall</string> <key>location</key> <array> <integer>128</integer> <integer>128</integer> <integer>32</integer> </array> <map> </llsd> and maybe make them available at a traditional URL like: http://example.com/regions/3F05D047-B5AF-4332-938E-675A1EA1D784 this would have the advantage that implementers could easily stuff experimental new parameters into the serialization. if we used the mime types in the client application launch message draft ( http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hamrick-ogp-launch-00 ) then we could hack our web browsers to recognize the application/ogpcal+xml content type and pass it to a client application of our choice. so.. to recap.. secondlife style URIs should be deprecated (or at least not used in VWRAP.) we should use URLs that use a well known protocol (like https) that describe a protocol endpoint for retrieving an LLSD blob with the information we're interested in. -cheers -meadhbh On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Hurliman, John <john.hurliman@intel.com> wrote: > I’ve seen a few places in the I-Ds and OGP wiki documents that refer to a > URI schema for a location in a virtual world (home location, requested login > location, etc). Has this been defined or discussed yet? I see the SLURL > format of: > > > > secondlife://region%20name/x/y/z > > > > How would this change to accommodate a location in any region domain? > > > > John > > _______________________________________________ > ogpx mailing list > ogpx@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx > >
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Meadhbh Hamrick
- [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Hurliman, John
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Kari Lippert
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Suzy Deffeyes
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Kari Lippert
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Richard L. Barnes
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Kari Lippert
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Dan Olivares
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Joshua Bell
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Richard L. Barnes
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Dan Olivares
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Han Sontse
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Dan Olivares
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Han Sontse
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? David W Levine
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Han Sontse
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Hurliman, John
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Joshua Bell
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Frans
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Richard L. Barnes
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Joshua Bell
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Hurliman, John
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Infinity Linden (Meadhbh Hamrick)
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Kari Lippert
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Joshua Bell
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations? Meadhbh Hamrick