Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations?

Kari Lippert <kari.lippert@gmail.com> Thu, 21 January 2010 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <kari.lippert@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16B728C160 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:45:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B2LjekEbO9-M for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:45:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ew0-f211.google.com (mail-ew0-f211.google.com [209.85.219.211]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BC628C15A for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:45:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so2916509ewy.13 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:45:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wnJHnfRKv6UzjNsn8YJNDXENpZ8bGmwGKcCr5eA6lCE=; b=fuE7KONpGlir41yE2kW9DSE27VtZBovqRNne9AVLXNoiucVEGdavR6UZnd69vWO9hM I3rsy5U9vyQ0gdE4lP5tNGjZeK3Ot3R4RyCfq6fDSvWablMyz8z4p/A4jckIGxU3bDcU s8o6B7NcNHIHFz72C/WOvXeF7GPqEQjcj1t9g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=wTphHE5nRgY3y9pJ+LcdkZdByt/CSfjFruLwUgj7uvGMAi16j5fN7b0xKMnOhGkH8k HCHOgSY1fCdFiC8ZKxUqJbgXw9/6xGmzZS175V2gHIRs5lDUUbAo9c50phKvUY+GEuBZ GbfYmPVhP8F14bDSeVfsrRMLrsWM9vTB/DBw4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.90.208 with SMTP id e58mr561107wef.57.1264081520666; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:45:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1219B05F-4C83-4B56-B71C-EDE2D7B1A874@bbn.com>
References: <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933DC4B2DC80@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <382d73da1001210434h2a6763e8n3f7615bd398169c6@mail.gmail.com> <2bd5b7f11001210527y3e24d664nbbc7cc83db63ef02@mail.gmail.com> <1219B05F-4C83-4B56-B71C-EDE2D7B1A874@bbn.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:45:20 -0500
Message-ID: <382d73da1001210545m5f8dbb7qf182ae26e4c0e30e@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kari Lippert <kari.lippert@gmail.com>
To: "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e6db2ae701aaa6047daceac2"
Cc: "ogpx@ietf.org" <ogpx@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ogpx] URI schema for virtual world locations?
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:45:30 -0000

I agree and I see this as a precursor discussion for things that must be
included in the information model!

Kari

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Richard L. Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com> wrote:

> I generally view URI schemes as subservient to protocols: The URI specifies
> what server you talk to and what you send it.  For example, <
> http://example.com/foo> tells you to send a request to example.com with
> "/foo" as the request URI.  So I would think that the elements of the URI
> would come out of the fields that we end up having in the protocol, rather
> than some information model that we come up with specifically for the URI.
>
> --Richard
>
>
>
> On Jan 21, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Suzy Deffeyes wrote:
>
>
> Is it overly confusing to allow specifying  look-at point? That would allow
> you to specify a link to a location that orients the user looking in the
> correct direction?
>
> The old OGP spec for rez_avatar/place allows it (
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OGP_Teleport#POST_Interface ), however, I
> have not implemented it in the viewer in any way, shape, or form.
>
> Suzy Deffeyes/Pixel Gausman
> IBM
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Kari Lippert <kari.lippert@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Here's a start....
>>
>> To design this, the better question to ask is what is required to uniquely
>> location a point in a virtual world? The information can always be encoded
>> with more user-friendly names/references as required.
>>
>> Name of World
>> Server
>> Instance
>> Region
>> x-coordinate
>> y-coordinate
>> z-coordinate
>>
>> IMHO I think that would cover it all - but I am not
>> intimately familiar with the inner workings of all virtual worlds.
>>
>> Kari
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Hurliman, John <john.hurliman@intel.com>wrote:
>>
>>>  I’ve seen a few places in the I-Ds and OGP wiki documents that refer to
>>> a URI schema for a location in a virtual world (home location, requested
>>> login location, etc). Has this been defined or discussed yet? I see the
>>> SLURL format of:
>>>
>>>
>>> secondlife://region%20name/x/y/z
>>>
>>>
>>> How would this change to accommodate a location in any region domain?
>>>
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ogpx mailing list
>>> ogpx@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> http://kjlippert.wordpress.com/
>> http://community.webshots.com/user/MissGnomer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ogpx mailing list
>> ogpx@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ogpx mailing list
> ogpx@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx
>
>
>


-- 


http://kjlippert.wordpress.com/
http://community.webshots.com/user/MissGnomer