IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] Weird OIDs in the 4880bis draft

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Tue, 14 February 2023 08:36 UTC

Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6291C14CE2C for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 00:36:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gnupg.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s7Gimv00jAKM for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 00:36:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [IPv6:2001:aa8:fff1:100::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B48FC14EB15 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 00:36:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnupg.org; s=20181017; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=eJ/c7wpbax/32RRq2hm3+NOpCN5Cx+/q/axMLXiygKo=; b=MFhLiDLv2M1QJ7fs2BZgVI+qlQ U0J+ar+ukuLFlHPp9SZdR+a0AexX0R6+FUowgVmXG/7ZmMiZqHB4cad2UKLAG8CiyT+NOwLPfOo0u xPOisFu8OKvr3m2ZpIqVUrhsZ99DqMMd4Cp/qIBDRgzFm+0fo1cgfL1byKGa0yS/RjTk=;
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.89 #1 (Debian)) id 1pRqnL-0006Xm-AB for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:36:11 +0100
Received: from wk by wheatstone.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.92 #5 (Debian)) id 1pRqm8-0004XB-0X; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:34:56 +0100
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Cc: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>, "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
References: <SY4PR01MB6251048223366D25E14FF34FEEDE9@SY4PR01MB6251.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com> <24d23b9f-50b4-0a80-d1a5-63b20c366a54@nohats.ca>
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
Jabber-ID: wk@jabber.gnupg.org
Mail-Followup-To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>, "openpgp\@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:34:50 +0100
In-Reply-To: <24d23b9f-50b4-0a80-d1a5-63b20c366a54@nohats.ca> (Paul Wouters's message of "Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:05:11 -0500 (EST)")
Message-ID: <878rh0tzkl.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=Sundevil_Rootkit_PEM_UNCPCJ_anthrax_Scammers_Norvo_Virus_Scully_BCCI"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/Le-bOEVJFYE3YJEPXBWlExlGYxE>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Weird OIDs in the 4880bis draft
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 08:36:17 -0000

On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:05, Paul Wouters said:

> I think we should use the new OIDs and mention the old OIDs in the draft
> for backwards compatibility.

Using new OIDs will eventually make keys and signatures created since 8
years invalid.  Further deployed software won't be able to handle any
newly created signature or key.  This is crazy, folks.

Sometimes I can't but fear the goal of the WG is to harm the repudiation
of OpenPGP.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service.             - A. Einstein

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email