IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] Weird OIDs in the 4880bis draft

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 14 February 2023 14:44 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5168C187991 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:44:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PqfCbeuX6Iwu for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:44:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR03-AM7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am7eur03on20715.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:7eaf::715]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D9BCC16B5A2 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:44:46 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=WyWaa6KYKDzLvFTM3aUlbda0AWuWTshExLDXqzHP5S6VfIRIzvrcl4KtRvHp8fjBy5QoCatl9DzYw2jat5cp3hKnapAKYhKE/MlfBbEk8c9EhK8SQXmpoqu882C5TEbCu1etgSyZSPFJgVAvjimWHu3cCNqesqT/g0nxhKK8NeCDBRrTymhfxWPRGl3rvBg39mknTfGejeXekMO1Qq/PBXwaeF52yoB7aNgBTJw6ID8KHvrIIEh6P/8/llpYO4fQMR464GnrFtmoBqKRoyWlp+UMfOM9gJdyy7sqyeXBr/yvwKlZgEGkxhHSskIk4izrnt8iGkDQTIQlEPeH8tM/Pw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=LMSgQZFQYWJQvQhmjfXcI3ZFiyviEy+ThD4ymnR1bdU=; b=Jx9QeOWc0D0jg4ONT9OTcpBdB0XGHZo/FlfJc+u8KTyl1Eh0j8lcuXpUyL4SByncX5sDFZ+kj6LlZH/UNQbq1z750eIF8KwtCnvosPGN3zseLyUJJWPA1FZRuFguxsLIHCsfoBLJRvAjqBDt7IhJCBkGOAqg36LUpGeeskA1N7TeYAqcmhHqYvc3sadT2NCGJAds3HTPPkNJVifXmQ/eBEgOGtoDWWZbl6ifxf4O12aLazlcvR9I9AOW4n85GV0e37RyZleF+qANB53UT6q1wt7LNg+ct/VlLT8+ysDffrEzWIjjRzLRNiQQB3AC0BPGY4ZXYQk8aEUMvrIEZrkFrw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cs.tcd.ie; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cs.tcd.ie; dkim=pass header.d=cs.tcd.ie; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=LMSgQZFQYWJQvQhmjfXcI3ZFiyviEy+ThD4ymnR1bdU=; b=Fl8ESYphYLF5oc/4OtpnuRbS0C1eRwUFlngEkd7ZFDk8Lgt397HgpI6R0831HIXZLnyrvDGNDZIEcmgf9aC0R9sLMS1WppG+fya3nOAK6fjXI8CbnUVvy/JRU7HdlboKVHoLEyzQvRSlacpUNl9UMjVlN3cY96iR0HiLkk9EUi5r9i8ctnqFge4obfFgY5YR5ZB/IaDq6mgfn4CgGFMcFxxwso2BECL8pB+fdMLc5VhInMZYHb0Vk8FVit/dxn7Yrw3QHmzRjWqV6AQ93FTKwEgBpsONzOzPQKEWi1yFcI+uiPisWfHOltvZCCL80JgBn8XKd3+dbIoWiQm9jZ0bqA==
Authentication-Results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=cs.tcd.ie;
Received: from DB7PR02MB5113.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:77::15) by VI1PR02MB6366.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:800:17e::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.6086.22; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 14:44:39 +0000
Received: from DB7PR02MB5113.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::47ff:ce7d:4074:b349]) by DB7PR02MB5113.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::47ff:ce7d:4074:b349%7]) with mapi id 15.20.6086.024; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 14:44:39 +0000
Message-ID: <13f2e75a-0a11-8803-15a4-1ef986f9a9f9@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 14:44:37 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
Cc: "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
References: <SY4PR01MB6251048223366D25E14FF34FEEDE9@SY4PR01MB6251.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com> <24d23b9f-50b4-0a80-d1a5-63b20c366a54@nohats.ca> <878rh0tzkl.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <072ad857-1591-cc9a-4276-d351bb2a327d@nohats.ca>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <072ad857-1591-cc9a-4276-d351bb2a327d@nohats.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------821sDSFybq9rwSy4jUOkLPWO"
X-ClientProxiedBy: DB9PR01CA0017.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10a6:10:1d8::22) To DB7PR02MB5113.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:77::15)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DB7PR02MB5113:EE_|VI1PR02MB6366:EE_
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: bcfd507b-5671-4d6d-2e7e-08db0e99fff0
X-MS-Exchange-SharedMailbox-RoutingAgent-Processed: True
X-TCD-Routed-via-EOP: Routed via EOP
X-TCD-ROUTED: Passed-Transport-Routing-Rules
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DB7PR02MB5113.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230025)(4636009)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(396003)(366004)(136003)(451199018)(8936002)(31686004)(478600001)(41320700001)(235185007)(5660300002)(86362001)(41300700001)(44832011)(21480400003)(83380400001)(8676002)(4326008)(6486002)(45080400002)(6506007)(53546011)(6512007)(2906002)(66556008)(66946007)(186003)(66476007)(2616005)(38100700002)(786003)(33964004)(36756003)(31696002)(110136005)(316002)(43740500002)(45980500001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: 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
X-OriginatorOrg: cs.tcd.ie
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: bcfd507b-5671-4d6d-2e7e-08db0e99fff0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DB7PR02MB5113.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Feb 2023 14:44:39.3991 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: d595be8d-b306-45f4-8064-9e5b82fbe52b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: Nrf/5VFRUupN9H8d7mlwG4jl+W4vE8EfkpvYNp21b/ef+cFZf9Wp29fCaVU4E1cy
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR02MB6366
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/T4QAU6Un9Z-brFYb7BnDHkKfty4>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Weird OIDs in the 4880bis draft
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 14:44:51 -0000

Hiya,

On 14/02/2023 14:39, Paul Wouters wrote:
> 
> This is good point to take into consideration. Is there a way forward
> that takes this into account? eg for v6 we can make changes, but perhaps
> for v3/v4 we need to keep using the old OIDs.
> 
> Thanks for this input Werner.

So can someone explain the benefit, other than in making
the spec tidier in a sense, of making this change?

If there're implementations that use these OIDs for some
configuration that affects applications other than PGP
for example, using the same/official OIDs would have a
clear benefit, but I'm not sure if that's the case or not.

Thanks,
S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email