IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] Weird OIDs in the 4880bis draft

Justus Winter <justus@sequoia-pgp.org> Fri, 17 February 2023 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <justus@sequoia-pgp.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B2AC14F744 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 10:14:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.694
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.694 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=sequoia-pgp.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qqo77na2o_z5 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 10:14:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from harrington.uberspace.de (harrington.uberspace.de [185.26.156.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8406C14F72D for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 10:14:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 11370 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2023 18:13:58 -0000
Authentication-Results: harrington.uberspace.de; auth=pass (plain)
From: Justus Winter <justus@sequoia-pgp.org>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>, "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <5bbca9f6-9fc5-3e8b-51eb-103637a6a4b5@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <SY4PR01MB6251BD1B19BAD5DE910A1C0EEED99@SY4PR01MB6251.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com> <5bbca9f6-9fc5-3e8b-51eb-103637a6a4b5@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 19:13:57 +0100
Message-ID: <877cwg9n2y.fsf@europ.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Rspamd-Bar: ---
X-Rspamd-Report: MIME_GOOD(-0.2) SIGNED_PGP(-2) BAYES_HAM(-0.808428)
X-Rspamd-Score: -3.008428
Received: from unknown (HELO unkown) (::1) by harrington.uberspace.de (Haraka/3.0.1) with ESMTPSA; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 19:13:58 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sequoia-pgp.org; s=uberspace; h=from; bh=ftdTfDRqzojCF24xKGob8+CJ3XT71IkvqRmfnKtKvAI=; b=OXkqzPrsOu3vXOUhoK+ktp5OmfoV0QWMq4oijJR9sZisbKtc4Gxhs7bbBWQhK54pNK//ub1Hk/ ORPKSBVsPBxoUTSB/xbM/imoyHYK40BTOXly3hsWoVGouFX4CbbPrvu7WpO/8uX89DvX8X4jV4FA NJT7AC1LMuhQVUEExFjsLzg3ka6WsV9no9sOCYP0LhcDtzxm98yjngsb3BFJXP23sizkkEpaje28 7ouG65bGZsDAbKwgQDqTTKr87gZA18k5uTQxRa/iG7lsHQQl64IwU8hs5cNMe9am5AUu1j/sExho YkPGBv1VmhxPv53lSxqjMv6++Vs6iHbRykIXHHXC+f3eDoQJCxurpbqtFP8wb8MpuutlPVxpzsKI 7mFT05Wxyts3wlOfIgoi+2k7AvnV4gO3+4drfHcyuofnAWY+ZGTcNcd0uw4mOM9O6SJMVwEftNuT wod4R439U2bRWdRiwDrYDem4OxbN2S8RVldHC23SfZD5rRTgMGCy8Y06xrwWauzLuX7okW81GpCx SCi0Rfk72FvZD46lcHermTmzpJ8f7bYfWWBgMAnXRoMRM+g9whv1C6ikCQ3Y0HFVwMAmBATaTMVA ZP0dN0+rh+My+ohqJN0N6EuMCO//w9JfvQuO22zHlLQI578YjZs3aObB2KVP9/QpTxfAgr50N9Ux U=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/Swr8KaKc0SJ60p0qGufUIvIodGg>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Weird OIDs in the 4880bis draft
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 18:14:07 -0000

Hello :)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> writes:

> That said, if someone were to create a merge-request
> in the next day or two with a suggested change, and
> if we see a clear WG consensus for that specific change,
> then that could just about make it into the next rev.

Here you go:

  https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis/-/merge_requests/240

The gist is:

  Use x509's OIDs for Ed25519 and X25519, see RFC8410.

  Also, use the opaque signature wire format for Ed25519, and opaque
  secrets for X25519.

  Keep the currently used OIDs for compatibility with v4 key material.
  Forbid its generation in v6 material.

Best,
Justus

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email