Re: [OSPF] Revised OSPF HMAC SHA Authentication Draft

"Phil Cowburn" <phil.cowburn@gmail.com> Mon, 21 August 2006 00:41 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GExrH-0001zx-5T; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:41:39 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GExrF-0001zs-VA for ospf@ietf.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:41:37 -0400
Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com ([64.233.162.205]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GExrE-0006ZI-P0 for ospf@ietf.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:41:37 -0400
Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i1so616750nzh for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=knODv2BtekzUnhOEUv0r36XW6YVFTp5uv1t4ifL5Yvd6lyVkcniCpxRWaD9Q3+8neaDLeBB65JKHY9sEONz0UFgLNM3tA7qfCbpNQy348CINoUZmPq9HdiiPWgup2HFMVKQO9DEKCdXcO3iVDjIHgd6HSqtYLsvnFwj7J7TaXJ0=
Received: by 10.64.143.4 with SMTP id q4mr4527285qbd; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.65.159.3 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <6e6ce9380608201741o6d90e1afob324624f96408e63@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 06:11:36 +0530
From: Phil Cowburn <phil.cowburn@gmail.com>
To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Revised OSPF HMAC SHA Authentication Draft
In-Reply-To: <44E8D7F2.20606@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20060819171729.55449.qmail@web25411.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <6e6ce9380608191759j6cee8034w44b0130d1d98d2e1@mail.gmail.com> <44E8D7F2.20606@cisco.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Cc: ospf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org

Hello Acee,

> Hi Phil,
> I think RFC 2328 is clear that authentication type 2 applies to all
> cryptographic authentication types.
>

Which is exactly what i'm saying.

In fact i just gave an argument saying that we must not create a new
authentication type for the stuff introduced in this new draft as 2328
is capable of handling different authentication algorithms.

Phil

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf