IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff

Klaas Wierenga <klaas@wierenga.net> Wed, 29 January 2014 15:42 UTC

Return-Path: <klaas@wierenga.net>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39581A03FB for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 07:42:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5TTWqMTiEtvA for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 07:42:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out21-ams.mf.surf.net (out21-ams.mf.surf.net [145.0.1.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709371A03E0 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 07:42:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from teletubbie.het.net.je (teletubbie.het.net.je [192.87.110.29]) by outgoing1-ams.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id s0TFfwtF008117; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:41:59 +0100
Received: from 173-38-208-169.cisco.com ([173.38.208.169] helo=dhcp-10-61-103-11.cisco.com) by teletubbie.het.net.je with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <klaas@wierenga.net>) id 1W8XD0-00050H-7l; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:37:46 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_583EEBBA-0393-457F-955D-177B978678C6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Klaas Wierenga <klaas@wierenga.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAPv4CP9YfiOGQ_e+6=6U2rLgxQxAZGQPdQ=SDSYW2m90xLKtTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:41:57 +0100
Message-Id: <C8BB5C29-0201-4362-AFC2-6D1675587085@wierenga.net>
References: <52E90863.5070805@cs.tcd.ie> <CAPv4CP9YfiOGQ_e+6=6U2rLgxQxAZGQPdQ=SDSYW2m90xLKtTQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-Antivirus: no malware found
X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: p-out:default, p:default, base:default, @@RPTN)
X-CanIt-Geo: ip=192.87.110.29; country=NL; latitude=52.5000; longitude=5.7500; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=52.5000,5.7500&z=6
X-CanItPRO-Stream: p-out:default (inherits from p:default,base:default)
X-Canit-Stats-ID: 0uLjPFWS9 - 5c42364eb296 - 20140129 (trained as not-spam)
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com)
Cc: perpass <perpass@ietf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:42:10 -0000

Hey Scott,

On Jan 29, 2014, at 3:16 PM, Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> wrote:

> First, what are the goals of getting organized? ☺  Some of us already consider privacy as a matter of course for new drafts (I do gen-art reviews in addition to WG reviews). I don't think we want to organize a group to comment on new material - it would be better get privacy/pm to be included in security considerations. My goal for a group would be to organize reviews of *existing* drafts/RFCs that are in common use. It shouldn't take a lot of work, maybe just a wiki page.
> 
> I'm enthusiastic about having a side meeting in London.

happy to be involved!

Klaas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email