Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff
avri <avri@acm.org> Sat, 01 February 2014 18:05 UTC
Return-Path: <avri@acm.org>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E701A05BB for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 10:05:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.234
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.234 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UajNJeP7a2jU for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 10:05:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from atl4mhob17.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob17.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71C71A05B3 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 10:05:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.203]) by atl4mhob17.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s11I5lWF001888 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 13:05:47 -0500
Received: (qmail 8743 invoked by uid 0); 1 Feb 2014 18:05:47 -0000
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 68.15.42.104
X-Authenticated-UID: avri@ella.com
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.15.109?) (avri@ella.com@68.15.42.104) by 0 with ESMTPA; 1 Feb 2014 18:05:46 -0000
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 13:05:43 -0500
Message-ID: <oeqd366s1f4yxry6pvhbhnw2.1391277943614@email.android.com>
Importance: normal
From: avri <avri@acm.org>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, perpass@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--_com.android.email_28229553092695380"
Subject: Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 18:05:55 -0000
Hi, Do you mean an instrument of self organization? I'll help in any way I can to get this off the ground. avri Sent from a T-Mobile 4G LTE Device -------- Original message -------- From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Date:02/01/2014 12:15 (GMT-05:00) To: Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>,perpass@ietf.org Subject: Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff Hiya On 02/01/2014 02:58 PM, Avri Doria wrote: > > > Hi, > > I am willing to be self-organized into a PM worrier's klatch. > and even to review drafts for PM But you don't want to be a non-self-organizer? :-) I'm still looking for one, at least between now and London. What happens later can be figured out there. I think it'd help for a more productive meeting if someone has time to think some about the options for doing these kinds of review for example. I've requested a room for Monday lunchtime for this anyway. There will not be a perfect time for such a session of course, but that's probably as good/bad as any earlier-week slot. S. > > I think one of the things the Worriers would need to accumulate over > time, though I am sure the basic list can be created already from > draft-farrell-perpass-attack, is a list of clues for practices and such > that might be something to be worried about. > > avri > > > On 29-Jan-14 08:55, Stephen Farrell wrote: >> >> Hiya, >> >> One idea that came up in Vancouver and that we (meaning at least >> me:-) haven't had a chance to progress was the idea of trying to >> get a team of folks together to go do privacy reviews of existing >> RFCs. Or perhaps slightly differently, reviews that explicitly >> consider pervasive monitoring, which might be more constrained >> and a bit easier. >> >> I think Christian H. commented at the mic that there is probably >> a *lot* of low hanging fruit out there, and I suspect he's quite >> right:-) >> >> Now that we're in the run up to the London IETF, if some of you >> had time to try self-organise that kind of thing that'd be great. >> Any takers for trying to organise that? >> >> Using this list to start with should be fine, if it results in >> loads of traffic we can spin up a new one, or move over to >> ietf-privacy@ietf.org. >> >> If there are folks willing to take this on and having a >> side-meeting in London helps, I can get you a room for that. >> >> Thanks, >> S. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> perpass mailing list >> perpass@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass >> >> > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > perpass@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass >
- Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff avri
- Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff Alissa Cooper
- [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff Stephen Farrell
- Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff Scott Brim
- Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff Stephen Farrell
- Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff Klaas Wierenga
- Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff Dave Crocker
- Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff Scott Brim
- Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff Avri Doria
- Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff Dave Crocker
- Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff Stephen Farrell
- Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff Stephen Farrell
- Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff Scott Brim