Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Output of the discard keys design team (#2673)

David Schinazi <> Wed, 08 May 2019 00:13 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E93C120183 for <>; Tue, 7 May 2019 17:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.392
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8bDqJyk-3sbQ for <>; Tue, 7 May 2019 17:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7174C12006E for <>; Tue, 7 May 2019 17:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=JFEvadxt5vEFCaqu0eMZ44QLEdI=; b=mYhAnKK45oryCUeP ou0KDp0FGv3cmc6e2IgPOwuIIMmHQTOpKbJS724qrk9Zxz61c6EBygjczFNBpjVL iR8THMXMUI4bv8qsQf11rSFKKA0rzvUEiEAnVUsPZ+gNuRcM+klmV78/2pYRiC6n sE68srjBM5i3DoUaAvMj1odJr1U=
Received: by with SMTP id filter0008p1iad2-8607-5CD21F35-1 2019-05-08 00:13:41.086821403 +0000 UTC m=+1047590.973198763
Received: from (unknown []) by (SG) with ESMTP id szQalmqBT0ypA8lETFqbiA for <>; Wed, 08 May 2019 00:13:41.113 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10509420181 for <>; Tue, 7 May 2019 17:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 00:13:41 +0000
From: David Schinazi <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2673/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Output of the discard keys design team (#2673)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cd21f35e673_41693ffb01ecd95c71310"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: DavidSchinazi
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0OiNbae6UgO+d5dILWiouoAdPy7bILnTaZxe jwZlOysKxVBWAyYdc3OAOGKaUsIhqUCtDUsYkkfB9irEHyek5t9Jqe9gah31Rc2jNHMtvE7sh8eZCh p1N/JVmk5UbJIVpD8MvYe4Or6kdS+OAkuMyY38QcYBFCWJEFTod+pnukPuE+o2tD+7BHPnr6HzYCBl 0=
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 00:13:44 -0000

DavidSchinazi commented on this pull request.

> +those send keys and until they receive an acknowledgment for one of them,
+ensuring the peer can discard their handshake keys.
+### Discarding 0-RTT Keys
+Clients SHOULD discard 0-RTT keys as soon as they install 1-RTT keys, since
+they have no use after that moment.
+Clients do not send 0-RTT packets after sending a 1-RTT
+packet ({{using-early-data}}).  Therefore a server MAY discard 0-RTT keys as
+soon as it receives a 1-RTT packet.  However, due to packet reordering, a
+client's valid 0-RTT packet could arrive after a 1-RTT packet.  Servers MAY
+temporarily retain 0-RTT keys to allow decrypting reordered packets without
+requiring their contents to be retransmitted with 1-RTT keys.  There is a bound
+on how long these keys can be temporarily retained: servers MUST have discarded


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: