Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document request forgery (#3996)

Lucas Pardue <> Thu, 13 August 2020 15:10 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140143A0CB3 for <>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.554
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mdrhwv9isAec for <>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 020F73A0CB2 for <>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:10:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=pgFD+DW6giZb5fq/XPxcIn6f6+RcuAKtR5NGj7QFzUI=; b= peWJ/61SZYKCxahKXRytO9AI9kCfqV2k1jd7pQ2Qwmxip4af+8hHpag9WF6HKTYS +RxK3eVmQI9JXTwweC6lH2tYrOqm5SlXRB+WLBHss0Sc1a3Wgbr5fS5/lrD2I8mA IVBWkgtXUFj4C6xnt6lJ8ld+5ML1yLyNFvjipzJ3DMg=
Received: by with SMTP id filter0248p1iad2-11082-5F3557D0-A 2020-08-13 15:10:08.580166343 +0000 UTC m=+757091.558396397
Received: from (unknown) by (SG) with ESMTP id uTeF7PBASD6V6SM9Pi8ztA for <>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:10:08.490 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6998F8C0501 for <>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:10:08 +0000
From: Lucas Pardue <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3996/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document request forgery (#3996)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f3557d067c4f_709616f81041c2"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3ZaMKaL/ds5rIndZxFlKanEYb8jrMjRcNRgy Bh//Z5ssnEiP+ezOW5C53Rm2zVYrbgxo8fJMy5FwRoIgU5a4Bgk1jmNqcMqvlw+V7iCwykfubUPtyu D0q5Yk/97vDznD7Bpm0b2N5zB1XR+FC3os26yWvhvEIwtrFfgqAz1zrq5LsXdzGrBMeL+g8vUgvENk o=
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:10:14 -0000

@LPardue commented on this pull request.

> +Unlike other packets, packet protection provides good protection against
+control over the contents of Initial packets. The choice of an unpredictable
+Destination Connection ID by clients ensures that servers are unable to control
+any of the encryption portion of Initial packets.

Then I might concate the next paragraph to this and say

"However, the Token field is open to control and does allow a server to use clients to mount request forgery attacks."

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: