Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Describe PMTU probing that includes source connection ID for routing … (#2402)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Sat, 02 February 2019 19:54 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C0512E7C1 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 11:54:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W0NFBfcHEx0h for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 11:54:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com (out-6.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D06C8127133 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 11:54:01 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2019 11:54:00 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1549137240; bh=v5qF2Qj4umappkI0rQZS+tp9aL37sfi2mgiLfvD+S4k=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=2J25KR9CoiU9sVD/qKmqDho41pf2OXmkCsHx2njJJ/yxSJHH8M4DcaFAkgjAuxSvA dI9+CwC9uuvz2BXEwqJsBbJg/onHO8qLoIBpBFB1zsHyCMWCNYiSF2nCmxUWPsLRR6 hRSEaZcaAk3sIQlsRWI6qeIMLNeBsAKdhlwUeXYY=
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab7f84e50a4fd904624921fff64b62c0fe4e01fc2692cf00000001186db75892a169ce1833165d@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2402/c459994241@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2402@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2402@github.com>
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_[quicwg/base-drafts]_Describe_PMTU_probing_that?= =?UTF-8?Q?_includes_source_connection_ID_for_routing_=E2=80=A6_=28#2402=29?=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c55f558896d2_39fd3ff6be6d45bc799512"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/m3c8GkaMu9A6PlTp2XaMguO4Exk>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2019 19:54:04 -0000

Sorry, but this sounds like a huge hack - coalescing with unused handshake packets. It also sounds like it is at risk of being ignored.

I'd rather see a specific permission for a probe packet with a longer header as the only long header permissible throughout the connection, and possibly require it to not be coalesced with anything.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2402#issuecomment-459994241