Re: [Rats] IPR statements about draft-ietf-rats-architecture

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 08 November 2021 11:50 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6BE3A0CB9 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 03:50:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LIoe0yruqINU for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 03:50:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62B4A3A0CB8 for <rats@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 03:50:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C961892A; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 06:52:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id tFPMjdGB2PSR; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 06:52:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0191892B; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 06:52:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 404DE624; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 06:50:38 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
cc: "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <A0549AA5-E660-4322-9C8F-CF2D582CEF04@cisco.com>
References: <A0549AA5-E660-4322-9C8F-CF2D582CEF04@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 06:50:38 -0500
Message-ID: <28065.1636372238@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/Z0wipRSkLBsAvPLQxlGLWj90lew>
Subject: Re: [Rats] IPR statements about draft-ietf-rats-architecture
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 11:50:50 -0000

Nancy Cam-Winget \(ncamwing\) <ncamwing=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > And IPR statement 4106 “offer FRAND royalty-bearing licenses for such
    > activities”.  These licensing

BTW: it seems that this is secondary.  The first paragraph of the offer seems
to say that if it's part of an IETF specification, that it will not be
enforced.   So it's essentially RF for IETF activities, FRAND otherwise.

(FRAND is not open source compatible, while RF is)


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide