Re: [Rats] IPR statements about draft-ietf-rats-architecture

Hi,

I agree w/ Dave Thaler - publish this Informational RATS Architecture as is.

There has already been far too long a delay.

Cheers,
- Ira

*Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)*

*Chair - SAE Trust Anchors and Authentication TF*
*Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG*

*Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG*

*Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WGSecretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer
Working GroupCo-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WGIETF
Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIBBlue Roof Music / High North
Inchttp://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
<http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic>http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
<http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc>mailto: blueroofmusic@gmail.com
<blueroofmusic@gmail.com>(permanent) PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839
906-494-2434*

On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 1:59 PM Dave Thaler <dthaler=
40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> My personal opinion is that publication should proceed, especially
> since the architecture document is just Informational.
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RATS <rats-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
> Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2021 7:46 AM
> To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>; Eric Voit
> (evoit) <evoit@cisco.com>; Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@arm.com>;
> rats@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Rats] IPR statements about draft-ietf-rats-architecture
>
>
> Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>     > I wouldn’t go by that date as I did a call for IPR and then had to
>     > wait. That might have been the trigger, not sure.
>
>     > Hannes, can your lawyers look at what’s been provided so far?
>
> The IPR disclosures on the IETF web site are almost always completely
> useless.  This one included in my opinion.
>
> Worse, a typo in the markup of the previous version means that the 3.1
> heading actually didn't render.  So it's not clear what the IPR claim
> refers to.
>
> At best the IPR declaration tells us what patent application to look at,
> and we don't even know if the PTO will even accept all the claims.
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RATS mailing list
> RATS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats
>