Re: [Rfced-future] New Version Notification for draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08.txt

[Eliot Lear <[e-mail]>]

If it's not too much trouble, let's tackle Mark's feedback so we can get 
as clean a version for LC as possible.  Please see below.

On 13.01.22 23:04, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> It seems that I missed this feedback when publishing the new version 
> today. My apologies for that. I can submit -10 to fix these issues, or 
> wait until after this next review period.
>
> Peter
>
> On 1/9/22 1:23 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> Thanks. Looking through the diffs, I noticed a few things:
>>
>> * "The RSWG is empowered to hold in-person or online-only meetings" 
>> -- this wording could be interpreted to prevent hybrid meetings, or 
>> online participation in in-person meetings.


>>
>> * "The RSAB consists primarily of certain voting members.  As 
>> specified herein, the RSAB also includes certain non-voting members." 
>> -- this is quite wordy...

This is editorial.

>>
>> * "The RFC Series Consulting Editor, in effect representing the 
>> Editorial Stream" -- my understanding was that the RSCE's inclusion 
>> on the RSAB was not only for this purpose, so this could mislead. 
>> Also, it makes this text somewhat contradictory: "Note: this method 
>> of handling vacancies does not apply to a vacancy of the RSCE role, 
>> To ensure the smooth operation of the RFC Series, the RSAB shall only 
>> of the stream representatives enumerated above."
This needs to be addressed.
>>
>> * "Email messages sent to the RSAB email discussion list or exchanged 
>> among all members of the RSAB shall be publicly archived..." -- I 
>> think the "or exchanged among all members of the RSAB" clause is 
>> impractical and ineffective, and it should be removed. I don't feel 
>> strongly about it to formally object, though.

This is addressed, I think.

Eliot