Re: [Rfced-future] New Version Notification for draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08.txt

[Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]>]

Ah - I thought you'd just removed "in effect" -- looks good.

Thanks,


> On 14 Jan 2022, at 10:57 am, Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> On 1/13/22 4:49 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>> On 14 Jan 2022, at 9:57 am, Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>>> * "The RFC Series Consulting Editor, in effect representing the Editorial Stream" -- my understanding was that the RSCE's inclusion on the RSAB was not only for this purpose, so this could mislead. Also, it makes this text somewhat contradictory: "Note: this method of handling vacancies does not apply to a vacancy of the RSCE role, To ensure the smooth operation of the RFC Series, the RSAB shall only of the stream representatives enumerated above."
>>>> This needs to be addressed.
>>> 
>>> In my working version I've removed the "in effect" clause.
>> So, that makes the RSCE the official representative of the Editorial stream. Is that our intent?
> 
> No. The next text saiys:
> 
>   The RSAB consists primarily of the following voting members:
> 
>   *  As the stream representative for the IETF stream, an IESG member
>      or other person appointed by the IESG
> 
>   *  As the stream representative for the IAB stream, an IAB member or
>      other person appointed by the IAB
> 
>   *  As the stream representative for the IRTF stream, the IRTF chair
>      or other person appointed by the IRTF Chair
> 
>   *  As the stream representative for the Independent stream, the
>      Independent Submissions Editor (ISE) [RFC8730] or other person
>      appointed by the ISE
> 
>   *  The RFC Series Consulting Editor
> 
> Therefore the RSCE is NOT a stream representative.
> 
> Peter

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/