Re: [Rfced-future] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 08 January 2022 02:14 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A963A1533 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 18:14:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.812
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.812 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.714, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YB-jDfn-vPRI for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 18:14:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1029.google.com (mail-pj1-x1029.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1029]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 245F73A1531 for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 18:14:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1029.google.com with SMTP id b1-20020a17090a990100b001b14bd47532so8552861pjp.0 for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 18:14:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D48lXkJUPOVAoI57aSKCFdy+LOQa8NZMVmaSf+oY7Oc=; b=Ftn1t027O+U8CMpaONFxHpGlIeo4vpzYlLp5x9lHbst4Eul/4B9eNAJVTVFpM5XdVb cZzWnkJuIMG9RK5+qs9KkQNk0EagnYkB9dJprgPW2SSJmpP/InI8G/OYx1zljLwFuzyZ 3dl/hEL99NuU3HTB1rxyCVUlLWDWEzKJNmFO5hH8/gYRMl/i+BryNmiUl/xUNMnC93xA ga/wI+ORcPH3QTyafTHpOiaxEzPBK1uergrWJk9x726iqvHNLKS3+qiGnJOMR6AV7e7J 3tyPH9rTJRk+9IolyR6zOB6jRgbgJHA1/1CS/iadj7f2SvhV+/pc/bE8UAnlPRzjeq/U dSTw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=D48lXkJUPOVAoI57aSKCFdy+LOQa8NZMVmaSf+oY7Oc=; b=CnpluZ8tvxJ7wLdgISis7W+l9FDYZ8ZQv2PwB56DFfyUhVTJwDznf9ojThcFPAb2ga rlPYxlvGf/snVwSHG7lBnwdZgbXjUH5FS9tHaOmwkbbiepXtK5NL0hsrCf6pmOHuP91Z uRzydfy/1+X5p3YRBDkNxFBG9IfsVf30CPwHU7JnJ68iZFwni+AdR/7xhwp7KHne5lVp Vp7Jt0L6k/FFcP6rvRDKqqS0xjZV29OahGUZFFN601ABgBLnIHUppCY14maps+rnVnyZ 1jiVbS930b4ryobgnBBnG6c36KXhZV2mvi13STPf53KfppK5cFprRbPKd5pUc+HHGUhG hWng==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532rp8yJqv/dvGD3tvZ0tmUInEBkAuLD7Yatindxqotugp76QLym w7AwYo9Xc+l0dx8lNxxlQ47ah8tI700xbw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwUvgrytf+kdANfTqex8uECEgGb6o59NGuPBi8QAOdfTgUyl9yAfVTgkks5JwYhBSYYfJfQuA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1c05:: with SMTP id oc5mr18386222pjb.31.1641608093395; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 18:14:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:1071:1701:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:1071:1701:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y3sm151508pju.37.2022.01.07.18.14.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Jan 2022 18:14:53 -0800 (PST)
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: rfced-future@iab.org
References: <164159953944.5205.10517887235280838552@ietfa.amsl.com> <1e6664f9-f19d-a226-e709-d03fe6968497@stpeter.im> <4d5c48a8-97ae-a984-bb43-3728849bfc54@gmail.com> <CABcZeBP1KR24_R7k2obs1VUc-L_YBgnJJ0Ex2D_sWpoWtpDajw@mail.gmail.com> <9ba72e0b-4a3d-70d2-47cc-ab3c21d14d90@stpeter.im>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b0cdefaf-25c6-0124-4df2-da42e82e655e@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 15:14:47 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9ba72e0b-4a3d-70d2-47cc-ab3c21d14d90@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/hciPEXX8IHbj-G47avjwX04G12g>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08.txt
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 02:15:00 -0000

wfm

Regards
    Brian

On 08-Jan-22 14:40, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> I'd prefer "rough consensus to the advance the proposal is lacking."
> 
> On 1/7/22 6:29 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>> Perhaps "not rough consensus" would be even more grammatical
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 5:13 PM Brian E Carpenter
>> <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>      Looks pretty good to me. One thing:
>>
>>       > The RSAB member believes, based on the results of the community
>>      call(s) for comment Section 3.2.3, that there is no consensus to
>>      advance the proposal.
>>
>>      Should that be "no rough consensus" to avoid any doubt?
>>
>>      Regards
>>           Brian
>>
>>      On 08-Jan-22 12:53, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>       > As promised...
>>       >
>>       >
>>       > -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>       > Subject: New Version Notification for
>>      draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08.txt
>>       > Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 15:52:19 -0800
>>       > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>>       > To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im
>>      <mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im>>
>>       >
>>       >
>>       > A new version of I-D, draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08.txt
>>       > has been successfully submitted by Peter Saint-Andre and posted
>>      to the
>>       > IETF repository.
>>       >
>>       > Name:         draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model
>>       > Revision:     08
>>       > Title:                RFC Editor Model (Version 3)
>>       > Document date:        2022-01-07
>>       > Group:                iab
>>       > Pages:                31
>>       > URL:
>>       >
>>      https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08.txt
>>      <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08.txt>
>>       > Status:
>>       > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model/
>>      <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model/>
>>       > Htmlized:
>>       >
>>      https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model
>>      <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model>
>>       > Diff:
>>       >
>>      https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08
>>      <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08>
>>       >
>>       > Abstract:
>>       >      This document specifies version 3 of the RFC Editor Model.
>>      The model
>>       >      defines two high-level tasks related to the RFC Series.  First,
>>       >      policy definition is the joint responsibility of the RFC Series
>>       >      Working Group (RSWG), which produces policy proposals, and
>>      the RFC
>>       >      Series Approval Board (RSAB), which approves such
>>      proposals.  Second,
>>       >      policy implementation is primarily the responsibility of the RFC
>>       >      Production Center (RPC) as contractually overseen by the IETF
>>       >      Administration Limited Liability Company (IETF LLC).
>>       >
>>       >      This document obsoletes RFC 8728.  This document updates RFC
>>      7841,
>>       >      RFC 8729, and RFC 8730.
>>       >
>>       >
>>       >
>>       >
>>       > The IETF Secretariat
>>       >
>>       >
>>
>>      --
>>      Rfced-future mailing list
>>      Rfced-future@iab.org <mailto:Rfced-future@iab.org>
>>      https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future
>>      <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>
>>
>>
>