IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfced-future] New Version Notification for draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08.txt

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 13 January 2022 23:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F6943A0CC3 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 15:49:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=AMGrK/Hj; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Mjjz9+L5
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5VYVIo6CLMFG for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 15:49:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D99253A0CC2 for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 15:49:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8BF32020AB; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:49:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:49:51 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=+ wBpJaMJ2BcdtdpQ0VUMf5nszyRZqeYGA3YZHQcRx+Q=; b=AMGrK/HjY+N1QNXuB HhJITUCb/GODR9GgLXfr2niDRgqZ/bUBsNykV8rHjpHnYw4TBIDlkA0Lgwc2+8gN sQNQxOdK5EeO1qehncS5XSf88uzUsQ9XDUIZQxk3G5f8p4bvBWlP8Z5Ta0iEopGd 0jQPwRFCDu/4g8irm4L/ITY1GmgjlPs+H4nQASUqk+LsBUxKAr5MAZAh49HjJfJF Jd9YcYGE9GW6yFVWo47jHqDJnm+oodHRYwGZ484uXrgxRuJrcGPnk/PR9pF4hWRB UMBOedRRslEqpU2uKr0GUoRnfzTW7WdTwjo5rd4eFioFxmwF57MuPYT/gAkq4rFN rZ7Ow==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=+wBpJaMJ2BcdtdpQ0VUMf5nszyRZqeYGA3YZHQcRx +Q=; b=Mjjz9+L51f0ky+VrSFFb7y+a0rgA4w1KOruq4PeBGmVcVeF4L/b6wD+dY YJkJLItV/nmgpbSO/NakNYAxVCH0kYC7W78VUhqvz+VHccOYTTQ4ZCEAs9gHWbS4 R/kxt+Iur3hRU9SeJMeAoP8La39sri5G6WGu0wWHjq67zRx3/NFJa8nfy+fdrsor Lu1RHZdnQalgJHaPPMZK52+TywiKzBYxNo9ywc8K617vOMaApdVQnVp26PX9YoQV t7obMyEztOoE0Dct8YaXMbKT3nfth0CEw5sw2IpeszhDMJ1bYXTuuYa1/DQrE0/V pNtVFi0sHT11yGHMR5aWSBy+7o//A==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:nrrgYWn9gfd1EIUvbAJ6K15U7WEWUfYqi01bnopHLDzhlJdBes-6Pw> <xme:nrrgYd1Xxx6gnQcHh-yfAmu8EQu7iACMgUTOx89VICJ22_7aoivfNfjsivm6SC6jR AQsoQWhD-uJyeBpUg>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:nrrgYUpP7dCnJtJkNKjCejFc6VFz8jqtYNuU15aiyGNGcu6U5CxD6t_58v2r_F_s3qjHmnoXOsEFloevZP_zwX_kqZMcKpNZ-Lw38mix2hm77AOikgNCZmf6>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrtdeggdduhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrkhcu pfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepvefffffhudetveevhfeuffeigedtuedtheffleetffeftddtgeegjeehieeuteet necuffhomhgrihhnpehmnhhothdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:nrrgYamqYrNm4K7IBGun5P1jRh9Fdgt_d2E2DLBzj0Gm3tS0ecj29Q> <xmx:nrrgYU1EZiQNoP6jvb1m2lvhG7mvtyBjqbqzVFeE1B8B5z6ZyWVscQ> <xmx:nrrgYRvfyp6DDAKdhE94qSzqH158aj48Akatr6rkgYohXIEermYBzA> <xmx:n7rgYXS8Ci6jPSv-Tmyh92dMgsyPRA99kSthAnZF7ITOBzrkiaeWKA>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:49:49 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.40.0.1.81\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <6ccbd9da-a618-7cb1-3171-b44181d4a1d0@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 10:49:47 +1100
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>, "rfced-future@iab.org" <rfced-future@iab.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F2CEC4D3-9555-43C8-8D4F-7C8AE6078CB1@mnot.net>
References: <164159953944.5205.10517887235280838552@ietfa.amsl.com> <1e6664f9-f19d-a226-e709-d03fe6968497@stpeter.im> <116833C8-6D7C-43B3-A91A-E63FCCE7C448@mnot.net> <14bde881-ae07-a3a6-b458-39ed69c05c36@stpeter.im> <e9a8e7ae-c11c-4ab3-d6f5-5ab2b2bcde09@lear.ch> <6ccbd9da-a618-7cb1-3171-b44181d4a1d0@stpeter.im>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.40.0.1.81)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/imaKFsE9lUCw-cwwNYDoyqHFXLM>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] New Version Notification for draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08.txt
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 23:49:58 -0000


> On 14 Jan 2022, at 9:57 am, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
> 
>>>> * "The RFC Series Consulting Editor, in effect representing the Editorial Stream" -- my understanding was that the RSCE's inclusion on the RSAB was not only for this purpose, so this could mislead. Also, it makes this text somewhat contradictory: "Note: this method of handling vacancies does not apply to a vacancy of the RSCE role, To ensure the smooth operation of the RFC Series, the RSAB shall only of the stream representatives enumerated above."
>> This needs to be addressed.
> 
> In my working version I've removed the "in effect" clause.

So, that makes the RSCE the official representative of the Editorial stream. Is that our intent?

If so, this note has become self-contradictory:

> Note: this method of handling vacancies does not apply to a vacancy of the RSCE role, handling vacancies does not apply to a vacancy of the RSCE role, only of the stream representatives enumerated above.

... as the RSCE *is* 'one of the stream representatives enumerated above.'

Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email