Re: [Rfced-future] New Version Notification for draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08.txt

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 11 January 2022 02:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76AFB3A0B16 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:01:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=atg3hZu/; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=YtKxa+QV
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id heKdOgxuwYf5 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:01:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 751F03A0B15 for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:01:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EBE45C00DA; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 21:01:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 10 Jan 2022 21:01:06 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=g PIUsGDVAjmDVjH6k71k/WEbGJaZphiV4h/xCKDlnPI=; b=atg3hZu/EtV4qAaW2 t2/db3ocSQAAtSEBC9SaDnXmI1yMJk49pzYYswwzzhXKIyO7KeQAOFcfzrpOXawo IOrbHNmKbUNVr2Qyg75d1vA3o/YKsiGe91TbXmw5ztyHlo57v7q2cRj9fDRn4EQI w52ESesjAbooLAhH2BfkjAGsF2D/dhez30vrRm8hUbROslCre87MxN3af3PbnDtD Bp0c5DFZIXEVtDELgQpVVETK8Zy8LqkZLmjoKYzdJLv8CQSYTJeO6tEwh8kr2mKs 2eAu4FXo4xq+934Any5MxaHl9vEwbxA8chutTtIG3e4lwUMlvevdUZNeurMW0OVA bESIw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=gPIUsGDVAjmDVjH6k71k/WEbGJaZphiV4h/xCKDln PI=; b=YtKxa+QV8LWLuJdTcvmsfNdPB1pbkaEoIrElAeZhraBrSai9nCdrGocYK dM/PP9KPsrMmZQq6ARiDLLdtc/gXvaQQeptpr3NpVHfZdpMr+QBxTy0qT0vtcwSL HuFLPRiFbvZ52O5hlp2u+kZGqGqbbysN357ruFc0AwNghUrlGReRM+Gulzn4cS9k RBY7B+ZkbbixyCFVpht3E+bKkBfa6HmN0BXCklNFcGNUqzZkjX3rrnUqbi+7uXO+ rHI2ZjBr5fJAZpD+ScgaVFjDUNzpe68lV7H0c6aRvOnKkoP7c49Y7jlVvv671pb9 //QR5FZQQ//AH0XBwLHcNZcw9mzMg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:4uTcYfjlHWgrQ6wIl6eOGdoHDDV6v6SCTKrLn5Glm_ayz2BTi4ml-Q> <xme:4uTcYcDW7Ykre9cxSYZdkWjsTrhwBrfYzaOKto2rAwR7gK5ISkT8dHhSUD8GBX7h4 j65N7GVkADL1gow5A>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:4uTcYfFHldl-ILPcD6oYwjvcWyraHyUY1xYWtTKiCpGwW11f9XuldwtHUvAdW1x16qUpkVVND0uvn-KwBNGmA3yfnCINv7_kDZ29QMOLQs87tJ7bLohBBDjm>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrudehvddggedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthejmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhk ucfpohhtthhinhhghhgrmhcuoehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeffueduheeggfeuieeludekudetfefhgeevgfekieekteffleffudejgfelfeet heenucffohhmrghinhepmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenuc frrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:4uTcYcSTQVhihpF0LUzbywqJvyFRTRWJI3eMRpFAk5_uZ0LqNGqTgg> <xmx:4uTcYczGoetPCDlVN8yErBzwjojCa5Z0MuvhRodKnZ_pldvCwIs98g> <xmx:4uTcYS6Jc1ngPWlxZuiNL2amHacxPEzenmYOmIeTwT3LCGkfYjpxig> <xmx:4uTcYWsEwTxYCDXw3xHKw9ierOaiwEOe8wyt2g9E8EBArREfLTg0MQ>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 21:01:05 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.40.0.1.81\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <de9ced67-5ab4-4dba-51f7-f9f169a5d2fa@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 13:01:02 +1100
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "rfced-future@iab.org" <rfced-future@iab.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <D714464E-4872-42EA-9CDF-5E3BD277CC3E@mnot.net>
References: <164159953944.5205.10517887235280838552@ietfa.amsl.com> <1e6664f9-f19d-a226-e709-d03fe6968497@stpeter.im> <116833C8-6D7C-43B3-A91A-E63FCCE7C448@mnot.net> <53ba55cb-5c1c-2052-f82e-212c8abc53e5@cs.tcd.ie> <de9ced67-5ab4-4dba-51f7-f9f169a5d2fa@stpeter.im>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.40.0.1.81)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/r65IB6FSyqT2xT234z-SS7OG34g>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] New Version Notification for draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08.txt
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 02:01:11 -0000

LGTM

> On 11 Jan 2022, at 12:58 pm, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
> 
> On 1/9/22 5:04 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> On 09/01/2022 08:23, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>> * "Email messages sent to the RSAB email discussion list or exchanged
>>> among all members of the RSAB shall be publicly archived..." -- I
>>> think the "or exchanged among all members of the RSAB" clause is
>>> impractical and ineffective, and it should be removed.
>> +1 - seems better to only publicly archive the "main" RSAB
>> list.
> 
> Proposed text...
> 
> OLD
> 
>   The RSAB shall keep a public record of its proceedings, including
>   minutes of all meetings and a record of all decisions.  Email
>   messages sent to the RSAB email discussion list or exchanged among
>   all members of the RSAB shall be publicly archived, with the
>   exception of topics that require confidentiality (e.g., personnel
>   matters).  Similarly, meeting minutes may exclude detailed
>   information about topics discussed under executive session, but
>   should note that such topics were discussed.
> 
> NEW
> 
>   The RSAB shall keep a public record of its proceedings, including
>   minutes of all meetings and a record of all decisions. The primary
>   email discussion list used by the RSAB shall be publicly archived,
>   although topics that that require confidentiality (e.g., personnel
>   matters) may be elided from such archives or discussed in private.
>   Similarly, meeting minutes may exclude detailed information about
>   topics discussed under executive session, but should note that such
>   topics were discussed.
> 
> /psa

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/