Re: [Rfced-future] New Version Notification for draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08.txt

[Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]>]

On 1/13/22 3:14 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:
> If it's not too much trouble, let's tackle Mark's feedback so we can get 
> as clean a version for LC as possible.  Please see below.
> 
> On 13.01.22 23:04, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> It seems that I missed this feedback when publishing the new version 
>> today. My apologies for that. I can submit -10 to fix these issues, or 
>> wait until after this next review period.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> On 1/9/22 1:23 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> Thanks. Looking through the diffs, I noticed a few things:
>>>
>>> * "The RSWG is empowered to hold in-person or online-only meetings" 
>>> -- this wording could be interpreted to prevent hybrid meetings, or 
>>> online participation in in-person meetings.
> 
> 
>>>
>>> * "The RSAB consists primarily of certain voting members.  As 
>>> specified herein, the RSAB also includes certain non-voting members." 
>>> -- this is quite wordy...
> 
> This is editorial.

Fixed in my working version.

>>> * "The RFC Series Consulting Editor, in effect representing the 
>>> Editorial Stream" -- my understanding was that the RSCE's inclusion 
>>> on the RSAB was not only for this purpose, so this could mislead. 
>>> Also, it makes this text somewhat contradictory: "Note: this method 
>>> of handling vacancies does not apply to a vacancy of the RSCE role, 
>>> To ensure the smooth operation of the RFC Series, the RSAB shall only 
>>> of the stream representatives enumerated above."
> This needs to be addressed.

In my working version I've removed the "in effect" clause.

>>> * "Email messages sent to the RSAB email discussion list or exchanged 
>>> among all members of the RSAB shall be publicly archived..." -- I 
>>> think the "or exchanged among all members of the RSAB" clause is 
>>> impractical and ineffective, and it should be removed. I don't feel 
>>> strongly about it to formally object, though.
> 
> This is addressed, I think.

Already fixed in -09.

Expect -10 momentarily.

Peter