Re: [Rfced-future] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08.txt

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Sat, 08 January 2022 01:40 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF7C3A13CC for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 17:40:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.812
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.812 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.714, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=stpeter.im header.b=pkzKYWwD; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=e06QRQuM
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HBDjBJwtyuXy for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 17:40:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC9153A13CA for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 17:40:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159B45C00CE; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 20:40:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 07 Jan 2022 20:40:48 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stpeter.im; h= message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references:from :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm1; bh=X o/BdCud5YtKpm8FmGHcXxq+oAJvmvCXBraP9e4iNFA=; b=pkzKYWwD1xOPjXP8n ruuT13KxEFqzo6+YWRQXGQeBHygLN0QSQlyXGw0tUMq5kY27u8EInepKUrEuf3JF ZIcPK2x915ebivGmC4HGveMfJ2BzQqAOY/rcQ7267a7SFduaKDjTTNvgSxfWfPNx zhwbrZDviwvOGSsQlsH/B5TRCWp7XVQNGmA6jK2VFmDSo7Q4k6p91w68GAyuNrUW g6/4iULV2+vD6ZUmXV1Y2xdanHLNwGy4kExTCyY8jtZaTwy6hipXM1xbOQGC/lrQ YeGympc/T52clEbk6w4m1/NbHO1I4fQBuRjydpe5CGEsf0xT3bm6mRIy1fw97bWF lGpYQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Xo/BdCud5YtKpm8FmGHcXxq+oAJvmvCXBraP9e4iN FA=; b=e06QRQuM8c2afU3RxeJkhExrnymRYzKvM8oAL3YebYHebY0VahlLxzVLq IOV4iXLfl4HCx8itYvvDTB/+UTmsJdzv0XLg378yPqqvv4AXhYpfbA8v/pee3Kmf u9V55xRaJuM2aLy4dRrWaMai3+WrjlKvSsrEyj7u4SfTDTGnrDOajk7cTFgMCSH0 hq4x3ppMgzIZaD55ru1Ggwa3T28fkJDGnfO4fmSOCEQlE8T9/0d/BX9Tkh01bLK9 UABqUTTETQ/BZCMUv1GzOOeXpuifZKKwkIhVDePfqBZtW2l8dg+4vc6Ly7cSjw5l bIn7J0wNXhoDMADTQwAiRrcMi8H0A==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:n-vYYURJdfe5MY7MjUAL1vlRNcs94lcLBMYoSPQwtXPqGpAMetbcgg> <xme:n-vYYRxmaYfUY5iiNNze4jEo1O0jHYQQTISDvb9q1dfPXIsbikKUpPxbRwza1rA9h Piq3Quz6g8wEgfFTA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:n-vYYR36zbomkEsYsWjWwO_Gx3tUB3wVt_K8tnzXwXNXx0rnW8mxBOCF9ml5pHJqiTGACP-WXmnhl8yOX7bnXQOTSQduMt7Yh9M-_KU>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrudegfedgfeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvfhfhjggtgfesthekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheprfgvthgv rhcuufgrihhnthdqtehnughrvgcuoehsthhpvghtvghrsehsthhpvghtvghrrdhimheqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeehffejvdffueevuefghedtkeffveekfffhveevfefhtdfh heeigfffleduhedunecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghdpihgrsgdrohhrghenuc evlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehsthhpvght vghrsehsthhpvghtvghrrdhimh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:n-vYYYD4CJZhcP6p1K9o4xotxj5_A2VXQh2CqkasiQd7gwkm130qrw> <xmx:n-vYYdiSWEOShjP_lAQCAcFmA2h0dAdhW0e1Ou7lwWPkiizm9HVbkw> <xmx:n-vYYUoyq3AnVomRjuEO6G8d2M7LoQirnbdG0SNMSguKH6raOTxpbQ> <xmx:oOvYYQsjos_8UhDYQ_YHy5QRQr4dvPlTFiLPxfZiW29TrKKDe6eqsA>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 20:40:47 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <9ba72e0b-4a3d-70d2-47cc-ab3c21d14d90@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 18:40:42 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: rfced-future@iab.org
References: <164159953944.5205.10517887235280838552@ietfa.amsl.com> <1e6664f9-f19d-a226-e709-d03fe6968497@stpeter.im> <4d5c48a8-97ae-a984-bb43-3728849bfc54@gmail.com> <CABcZeBP1KR24_R7k2obs1VUc-L_YBgnJJ0Ex2D_sWpoWtpDajw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBP1KR24_R7k2obs1VUc-L_YBgnJJ0Ex2D_sWpoWtpDajw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/Mg3beZFei1ATY4H43tFcRkgGm3s>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08.txt
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 01:40:54 -0000

I'd prefer "rough consensus to the advance the proposal is lacking."

On 1/7/22 6:29 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Perhaps "not rough consensus" would be even more grammatical
> 
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 5:13 PM Brian E Carpenter 
> <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Looks pretty good to me. One thing:
> 
>      > The RSAB member believes, based on the results of the community
>     call(s) for comment Section 3.2.3, that there is no consensus to
>     advance the proposal.
> 
>     Should that be "no rough consensus" to avoid any doubt?
> 
>     Regards
>          Brian
> 
>     On 08-Jan-22 12:53, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>      > As promised...
>      >
>      >
>      > -------- Forwarded Message --------
>      > Subject: New Version Notification for
>     draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08.txt
>      > Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 15:52:19 -0800
>      > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>      > To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im
>     <mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im>>
>      >
>      >
>      > A new version of I-D, draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08.txt
>      > has been successfully submitted by Peter Saint-Andre and posted
>     to the
>      > IETF repository.
>      >
>      > Name:         draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model
>      > Revision:     08
>      > Title:                RFC Editor Model (Version 3)
>      > Document date:        2022-01-07
>      > Group:                iab
>      > Pages:                31
>      > URL:
>      >
>     https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08.txt
>     <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08.txt>
>      > Status:
>      > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model/
>     <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model/>
>      > Htmlized:
>      >
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model
>     <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model>
>      > Diff:
>      >
>     https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08
>     <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-08>
>      >
>      > Abstract:
>      >      This document specifies version 3 of the RFC Editor Model. 
>     The model
>      >      defines two high-level tasks related to the RFC Series.  First,
>      >      policy definition is the joint responsibility of the RFC Series
>      >      Working Group (RSWG), which produces policy proposals, and
>     the RFC
>      >      Series Approval Board (RSAB), which approves such
>     proposals.  Second,
>      >      policy implementation is primarily the responsibility of the RFC
>      >      Production Center (RPC) as contractually overseen by the IETF
>      >      Administration Limited Liability Company (IETF LLC).
>      >
>      >      This document obsoletes RFC 8728.  This document updates RFC
>     7841,
>      >      RFC 8729, and RFC 8730.
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      > The IETF Secretariat
>      >
>      >
> 
>     -- 
>     Rfced-future mailing list
>     Rfced-future@iab.org <mailto:Rfced-future@iab.org>
>     https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future
>     <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>
> 
>