IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Wed, 17 September 2014 11:38 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226A81A01FA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 04:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pEdWnV6eAmL1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 04:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 855921A00F5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 04:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f793d6d000005356-fe-541972965087
Received: from ESESSHC013.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id FF.F0.21334.69279145; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:37:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.136]) by ESESSHC013.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.57]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:37:58 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
Thread-Index: AQHP0lfQaumnpGxwmEiAQbmuYTUoDpwFMYXA
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:37:57 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D44EC29@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <CA+9kkMCZT1XW4LLaJ4Nq2DbrxD59cYnjLo5JXn9fjEb8pyamaQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D41CDC3@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAKz0y8zycsyr9m4BA=-8xOaWkU+Sog5Mbz7K-oN3woqi++mVzg@mail.gmail.com> <53F451CF.10705@alvestrand.no> <001b01cfbc94$fccd5310$f667f930$@co.in> <CAKz0y8zNM3rc3XC6JqrK+d4hXiT5TomhNM+W2twg0+-83-pFow@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUnfB5bskH4zWRfBMdHbSoqftV5Fo_GEXoLt9XCH9Tt_w@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxsT9Vdm0=tjk9WsLAH4ekbAizgyjm--168TrOf8UAYGZw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXUpibu8kWYmbJJJT2J3RNGXFV8LbceLijgG0U-pGY2xQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKz0y8z_oBf2efavfOLgzqE1R8sZstefZ1tvwwJLkhRskXZERQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxsSqA=cki_fSaqAPP0GXCv_kHr6571C+K9ze4ceHCGYdQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D427B68@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <D01D6B42.104F8%rmohanr@cisco.com> <009001cfbe4f$6b92f280$42b8d780$@co.in> <CAKz0y8y3=0_-jwWiviR_Uj6tSq75NEq92Ocergc_NvFk2h_72Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxugaPq=cLppPUqT8CUADV-E2zDMcz6m3sUgKOnK-TdQfQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnU6kv+=jQuxj4Ci-zYW9mHEfJ=6jqqrdqDTopPN06-kgw@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=7ouEv2wkD=WFmVKYvufCCsPEdbii0HG8aa0YaaJb15g@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D44E78E@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <D03F4FB3.12EAA%rmohanr@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D03F4FB3.12EAA%rmohanr@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.20]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrNLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje60IskQgzuLNCym77OxWN61g9Fi 7b92dgdmj3MN79k9pvzeyOqxZMlPpgDmKC6blNSczLLUIn27BK6MV4v2MxVsF6r482gJYwPj Kv4uRk4OCQETiT/XrrFC2GISF+6tZ+ti5OIQEjjKKDFzxlRmCGcJo8Sn7naWLkYODjYBC4nu f9ogcRGBfkaJn5N2s4B0CwsESmzdP58dxBYRCJL49msvI4RtJPFizyI2EJtFQFXix9HZTCBz eAV8Jd70lUPMf8Ip8ejGNiaQGk4BfYnmhutgFzECXfT91BqwOLOAuMStJ/OZIC4VkFiy5zwz hC0q8fLxP6gPFCWuTl8OVa8ncWPqFDYIW1ti2cLXYPW8AoISJ2c+YZnAKDoLydhZSFpmIWmZ haRlASPLKkbR4tTi4tx0I2O91KLM5OLi/Dy9vNSSTYzA2Dm45bfuDsbVrx0PMQpwMCrx8Cq8 lggRYk0sK67MPcQozcGiJM676Ny8YCGB9MSS1OzU1ILUovii0pzU4kOMTBycUg2M0fM0C19s rd69zG/330ecr9Z+5uUo37X38dTLdo/jFh761xETslo6604Cz+rHU3d93Pe/4UliT9Dr1l0/ nluveulsmbPrftN+sdwEO95Sm7DdnwpkwnmPxaS8Df0YEbeg+19zY035ee6N7Oeaezj2C53P 77UQ3Bh299zZPq3dPyZruO10XZr6RYmlOCPRUIu5qDgRAFE2/8x+AgAA
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/B2Vc-DH14BPwQz4tO1hfm6jGBFs
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:38:03 -0000

Hi,

The latest version look good. A couple of editorial comments:


Q1:
-----

In the Introduction, maybe we could modify the last paragraph in the following way:

	"When a (full) ICE implementation interworks with an ICE-lite
	implementation the ICE-lite implementation will not generate consent
	checks. It will, however, response to consent checks in the same way
	as it responds to any other STUN binding request."

I think that makes it more clear that the draft does not require any changes to existing ICE-lite implementations.


Q2:
-----

In section 4.1, maybe you could be more clear and say:

"A WebRTC implementation [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-overview], which implements *(full)* ICE"


Thanks!

Regards,

Christer

-----Original Message-----
From: Ram Mohan R (rmohanr) [mailto:rmohanr@cisco.com] 
Sent: 17. syyskuuta 2014 12:15
To: Christer Holmberg; Iñaki Baz Castillo; rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness

Please look at the latest revision and let us know if any other text is needed for this.

Ram

-----Original Message-----
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Date: Wednesday, 17 September 2014 1:24 pm
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call
for	draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness

>+1
>
>Regards,
>
>Christer
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz 
>Castillo
>Sent: 16. syyskuuta 2014 15:05
>To: Martin Thomson
>Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for
>draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
>
>2014-08-25 19:15 GMT+02:00 Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>:
>> Any WebRTC entity MUST implement full ICE
>
>Why? In server side implementing ICE-Lite is really operational and 
>*easier*.
>
>Please, don't drop ICE-Lite.
>
>
>--
>Iñaki Baz Castillo
><ibc@aliax.net>
>
>_______________________________________________
>rtcweb mailing list
>rtcweb@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>_______________________________________________
>rtcweb mailing list
>rtcweb@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email